Would it be inappropriate to review the reviewer? Ms. Larson's highly negative review invoking white male privilege is quite ludicrous. Her masterful use of woke gender phraseology aside, she apparently has no interest in exploring the scope and scale of regional or National history over the last century from one who experienced it all firsthand.
Charlie's eyewitness view of the profound change our world has experienced in the last century and the personal struggles and battles he overcame in a life well lived were uplifted by his demonstrated resilience.
Charlie's self-reliance and Horatio Alger-like story Larson wishes to dismiss as "cisgender privilege". Such a mean-spirited and subjective review should not appear first in the feed.
