Alan Mathew – Google

A true man do not destroy a family like that why he choose a married woman if you really deep into the story you will know that after that sometime Prem and sylvia separated for knowing each others feelings there are some letters that showing that he feel truly loved her he will be tell her husband and take her with him he was just using her Prem use her loneliness to he feel loved her he propose her to to marry him why for waiting for a one year if you think a person that can be cheating with a married woman it is not love it is lust after sometime he also leave for another woman if a man can do with a married woman also cheat after he married her Prem has so many relation before why he doesn't married any woman because he know a woman is used for playing only prem sister does not have any morality she bring the women for him she was a stupid woman that destroyed a family with her brother in every scriptures adultery is a crime some people says the true love why does the married woman loves for an another man after they have children a true gentleman does not destroy any families why he does not meet husband and talk about that he just using her vulnerability the Nanavati and Sylvia love marriage if a man can cheating with a married woman he also cheat after marrying her he loved her body not her He who commits adultery has no sense and whoever does so destroys himself”

The acting was fine but the premise of the affair is somewhat not believable, which I attribute to bad writing. I see nothing remotely interesting about Ivan for Suzanne to abandoned her family to be with an ex-con who cannot support her financially. I think it was a casting issue. Not only that, she is willing to abandon her teenage children without any thought of the emotional toll it would take on them. He had nothing to give other than his body and "lust". I doubt he even loves her because he was thrown into a chaos of a relationship when he just wanted to have fun. There was no need to have divided loyalty between children. I don't think this was an honest portrayal of how teenagers respond to infidelity by one parent. I think this was poor writing and poor research of the psychopathology of teenagers, especially boys. There is no way the teenage boy would side with a mother that cheated (outside of abuse). Why? Because mothers are representations of the women that the teenage boy would eventually date. It would cause that teen to really think about his future relationships. Thus, his anger would be directed towards the mother. Similarly, teenage girls are very harsh toward both parents but especially fathers who cheat. That is why we have youngs women with daddy issues. Also, I would hope people would start honestly evaluating human behavior. I do not believe it is love. It is just lust and insanity masquerading as love. If it were love, Ivan and Suzanne would be able to survive without her husband's money. Her husband had every right to flex his financial muscle. You cheated on your husband and expect to get his money so that you can live with the guy you cheated with? It also demonstrates that Suzanne did not love her husband, she just stayed for financial security. Instead of focusing on her "burgeoning" love, she was still consumed with financial stability. So, now, she kills the father of her children. She goes the prison and what? So, they lost both parents. I wonder which side the children will take on this issue, the mother that killed their father or the father that got killed? It is a close one. Female writers rarely have an honest portrayal of female characters and Catherine Corsini was no different from her depiction of Suzanne.