Judge Karen lectured a plaintiff about his opinion on building the wall on our southern border. She asked him where his parents came from and what the laws were when they immigrated. The wall would help secure our countries border against people from illegally entering. Judge Karen knows that their are currently laws on the books(that are not being enforced) that prevent people from entering illegally. Clearly from listening to her comments the porous southern border is of no concern to her. I have no evidence that Judge Karen would let her distaste for the current immigration laws or any other current laws effect her rulings, however in light of her compelling need to mildly scold this plaintiff on his favorable opinion on the wall, leaves me wondering.