I think Levine gets his anecdotes crossed when he pressure cooks Marxist economy with anarchist uprising. What part of economics does Levine not really associate with? I would say he has never been a patient proletariat. Riots and BLM and weaponized bourgeois is anarchy. None of those edifice a Marxist economy. Marxists need capitalism to benefit from staying at home and literally having no part in the daily chore of others in the workplace. The workplace has become something that represents aggression and doesn't create any sort of healthy enough mood to keep supporting large teams of anarchist crutches like these people that I guess need riots and BLM and total illegal immigration until everyone that understands is at home waiting for you people to disappear. And we know it's a long suffering silence routine. There's a lot of aggressive wrong doing in these workplaces and labeling it Marxism might make Levine seem poorly written in this regard.