Joshua Eigbe

The prevailing critiques of this book often exhibit a certain bias, contending that the author failed to meticulously gather sufficient evidence. It's crucial to understand that this man probably didn't spring from an atheist family; rather, he embraced atheism subsequent to what he perceived as supporting evidence for atheistic beliefs. In essence, he was already an atheist, firmly rooted in atheist ideologies, likely exposed to the teachings of prominent atheist scholars. Arguably, he didn't require more atheistic information or evidence (as he was already an atheist); what he needed was to venture to the other side of the ideological divide to grasp an alternative perspective. In this journey, he must have critically compared the evidence with what he had previously absorbed. Furthermore, it's noteworthy that recent assertions about the authorship of scriptural texts have arisen, suggesting that the original Apostles might not have been the authors. However, it's essential to note that many individuals who contributed to these scriptures bore witness to Jesus' crucifixion. While some of his Apostles were absent at the crucifixion, his tomb remained readily accessible, and his body was tended to daily. Additionally, had there been any hint of foul play, at least one of the eyewitnesses would likely have raised concerns. Astonishingly, none did, and they even passed away maintaining their belief in what they had seen. Remarkably, there were over 70 eyewitnesses who remained unwavering in their accounts, making it difficult to substantiate claims of foul play. In essence, "A Case for Christ" chronicles a man's profound exploration of religion, steeped in a scholarly understanding of atheism, and his pursuit of a comprehensive comparison between these opposing worldviews.