For those of us who are old enough to have had parents/grandparents involved in WW1 & 2, + The Great Depression, there are parts of "The Crown" which do tend to indulge in some revisionist history, at times. A somewhat sympathetic portrayal of the deposed Edward & Mrs. Simpson doesn't seem to cover their sinister flirtation with Hitler and a plot during WW2 which would have the Nazis put Edward back on the throne if they'd won + kill Churchill. Their sad, extravagant pointless life afterwards gives their fairy tale a pin prick. Poor Princess Margaret was, in fact, a drain on the royal purse not to mention one of the more useless members despite her intriguing life. She had no one to blame but herself for her royal romping! Princess Anne gave more of a surprising turn-- and is the one sibling who is most like her Mother. The Queen Mum was much more than a conniving, interfering old biddy & she had helped Britain greatly in WW2 to maintain morale. Like so many of the past Prince of Wales', while I do admire some things about Charles, he is a weak, self-indulgent, immature man. Not being able to stand up to 'Mummy' before, brought countless grief and sadness to Lady Di, their children and many others. Not leader-ship material! And as for Camilla, who's never done a honest days work in her life before-- and is now being trotted out in the royal dog & pony show-- not Queen material, either! What "The Crown" mainly emphasizes is Elizabeth's sense of 'duty'. She gets to seem like such an old stick at times, but she really did herald in another 'Elizabethan Age' with some revisions!