Eron Lee

Comical concept, it's almost a charitable travesty to benefit the most random set of people of the face of the Earth and automatically guaranteeing them social stardom after the show where they try hard to maintain their relevance by pushing their feed down our throats wherever we look. The show lacks any realistic input for what it pursues, you purposely cast in these "attractive" people and you really expect us to believe that they can be changed to appreciate forming "deeper connections" within 3-4 weeks, if anything this show endorses the opposite... the success to failure ratio with everlasting relationships is pretty low, here are the examples. 1.Harry Jowsey from Season 1, the first true main character to be under the test of chastity. Broke the rules countless times, redeemed himself with his intentions to breakthrough with Franscesca. Fast forward, social media outbreaks surfacing how he no longer loves her the same way after proposing to her. So what does he do next? Associate himself with a-listers, sponsor himself for doing absolutely nothing and promote sex as a main topic in his podcasts. This is the kind of useless celebrity this show has created in the process. 2. Cam & Emily, despite the numerous letdown Emily persisted through her relationship with Cam. This show wants us to believe they bonded and connected, I'm inclined to believe the message behind this is that no matter how disloyal you are, how unfaithful you are, you're deserved undying love for the sole reason of being attractive to the opposite sex. 3. Nathan and Holly. The worst season with the worst coupling to date, the developers allowed these guys to stay on the show regardless of their stipulation. The message behind this was if you're a f**kboy to the core, clearly you have more chances of being a reliable partner opposed to the good samartian with pure intentions. Anyone with intelligence could see that Nathan was not going to change, but you allowed this because you felt the audience with exterior standards needed him on the show. This show serves no purpose to working class people, it's more of a vocational offer to formed stereotypes from socially conditioned minds to transpire further into the whelm on social media and benefit themselves on every given platform. Not 6+? No chance of you getting any ladies buddy. No buttocks? No male appreciation for you. All the tools, all the gimmicks and in the end all you did was get people rich for free.

Used to love this as a kid, this was one of my best memories when I was 9/10 years old in 2005 watching this at the Cinema with my cousin. However as I'm now 26, rewatching this makes me question this film's production. As an ethnic man it hasn't escaped me that the conventions used for this film has zero black people starring in any role which supports subliminal discrimination and showing signs of white supremacy. If this isn't proof enough, 15:44 into the film the Samantha James character calls probably the only ethnic person that is shown for a second "Hong Kong Phooey", this stereotype used is clearly racist. The production of the film is mainly conveying a romantic 'White Christmas', which is seemingly based in New Jersey and in 2005 exactly when were they all primarily white folk? Anyway, this is important for me & anyone who psychologically absorbs these films. I'll probably reinvent my opinion on a film that sadly had a lot of value for my childhood over one scripted line.