Spoilers ahead
Ok, so this is definitely A thought provoking sitcom. Brimming with wit, solid character arcs, addictive story graph, fastpaced, ironically deeply philosophical.
My only question is if the script depended so heavily on western philosophers for99% content then why did it draw from eastern philosophy for its climax?
Highly incongruent and dystopic to end in sense of insignificance, nothingness, vacuity, you name it.
Pause and reflect. Would a mastermind creator logically create such beautiful people with colourful personalities for them to end up monk-like, abandoning earthly attachments and dissolving into oblivion?
Why can't we revisualise the ending as we ve begun to understand the ultimate heaven... Which is "bringing heaven on earth"? Where relationships and actions *here on earth* are the centre of eternity. Why should eternity be a mystery? Isnt that copping out?
If the Creator is Love and all things are held together by the mystery of His or Her will, then it should be no mystery that the creator wants immortality here on earth, alongside our loved ones, as "the ultimate good place." Not an ambiguous future of isolation