Any positive reviews by film critics must be thinking/worrying about what their peers might be saying of their analysis. But they must NOT be true Bond fans who paid to go to the movie theater and actually say they enjoyed this movie. If they wrote this for their peers that’s OK. They probably thought it “checked all the boxes,” bla bla bla, as they say. But as a review to help inform potential movie goers they need to re-examine what their goal was in writing this stuff. Who goes to see a Bond movie for the cinematography? A film critic! That’s why it’s a dying job and why people now go to the likes of IMBD.
Except for around 20 minutes this movie was a boring mess. Not only was it not fun, not enjoyable it was depressing. In our theater the audience booed loudly. To big thumbs down!