Rajesh Zade

It's a good movie. But it's very historically inaccurate. I actually love Britannic, she's my favourite ship. Well, but about the movie, its nothing compared to Titanic 1997. I watched this film after I watched Titanic, and.. eh.. this film kinda felt weird. First of all, Britannic listed, not capsized. The sinking is wrong and kinda confusing. I mean, the ship sank in the morning, not night/afternoon.. So yeah, its really inaccurate. Even though I understand, in 2000 we did not knew much about HMHS Britannic. Overall, its an OK film. I dont recommend watching this if you're looking for a historically accurate film. Plus, the CGI, special effects, the "love story" are sort of, you know, weird.

The movie is good overall. The dialogues, screenplay, costumes, editing etc. is awesome. Leonardo DiCaprio as always, was awesome as Romeo. His acting was terrific! Claire Danes as Juliet, not really impressed. She seem like she was reading dialogues right from a book. She could've been better. Kate Winslet would've been the perfect Juliet! I wish they had casted Kate Winslet as Juliet because I know Leo was the first and only choice for Romeo, and he did great. Ever wondered why Titanic was such a successful movie? One of the reasons is Leo & Kate's chemistry. Kate was really amazing as Rose. Well I'm not gonna talk about some other movie now, but some scenes were so cheesy and cringy. I repeat, SOME, not all. Nevertheless, this movie was good overall but I prefer the 1968 version. If you're looking for a good Romeo & Juliet adaptation, I recommend the 68's version with Olivia Hussey.