Tabasco Sauce – Google

I am really into forensic science. I am fascinated with human remains to be specific. I know it's morbid, but it's super interesting to me how old the body decomposes in different situations. It's also super interesting that the body can help lead investigators to solve a case no matter how long ago it happened. So, when I found the show bones I was super excited because the main plot is exactly what I'm interested in. The characters look at human remains and piece together a story. This includes how the victim died, who they are, and when. in real life, this can take months, years, or even decades. In this show, cases are solved within a day or two. and not only that, but it's mainly the forensic anthropologist that solves the cases rather than private investigators, consultants, detectives, police, etc. it is so unrealistic that I cannot even get immersed into most of the plots. each episode is rushed, forgettable, and insanely frustrating. The technology used in the show is so fake and unbelievable that I can't help but laugh at it most of the time. The artist, Angela, is able to create animations depicting COD scenarios within seconds and can sketch how the victim looks within 30 minutes. This is the most ridiculous part about the show because it makes it seem like this job is easy. Like I said before, this process can take decades. I think the purpose of these shows is to be able to immerse their audience. and it's not just bad because the technology is fictitious. Look at Star Wars, everything about that movie is science-fiction yet people are still able to get immersed in the plots. That is because it is well written and obvious that it's purely fiction. Bones tries to be realistic , Which in my opinion, is confusing because mostly all of the tools and technology they use can easily fit into a science-fiction movie. You have to choose one or the other if you don't want to put effort into the writing. It is possible to mix science fiction and reality but bones fails to do this properly. so the result is a horrible show. In fact, most of the fictitious technology is there because the show needs to be rushed. there is no excuse for this. Look at law in order, Monk, etc. they all have episodes that run the same length as bones yet the episodes aren't rushed at all. The writers give the audience a chance to fully understand what they're watching and become interested in it. to be honest, I don't understand why bones lasted as long as it did and why anyone can continue to be a fan of it. It fails to be entertaining and is definitely not a show I recommend to anyone

Love love love this show. Bea Arthur is one of my favorite actors. Walter did get on my nerves a lot but it just goes to show how well Bill Macy played his part. If you like Bea Arthur, you will love this show! Also, to address the "liberal" views.. This show was one of the first of its kind. It addressed controversial topics and, honestly, it's one of my favorite parts of the show. Wether you agree with the points or not, it's still super interesting to watch. :) Most of the views depicted in the show revolve around women's rights. So if that's something you don't like, I guess you should skip this. But if it brings you some comfort, Maude is comically liberal. Meaning she's so liberal that other people find it ridiculous sometimes. Think of shows like American Dad, where the main character is so conservative that it's a joke throughout the show. Just take it lightly and I promise you will enjoy Maude!

I really wanted to like this movie, but it really fell short of my expectations. I'll begin with the cast. While the actors did an excellent job, it was hard to get over how they didn't really look like Lucy or Desi.. at all. It's very distracting throughout the entire movie. I understand that it's impossible to have carbon copies of Lucy and Desi, but in my opinion these actors don't look like they could even be related to them. That, to me, is a huge problem. Secondly, the pacing. At times, it's incredibly confusing and difficult to follow along. Past, present, and future events are shown in a very choppy manner. Rather than presenting itself as a story, it just seems like a rushed retelling. A lot of the "flashbacks" seem irrelevant to the plot and are almost distracting. In my opinion, Lucy and Desi meeting and falling in love should of took place in the very beginning of the movie. To make it short, the story should of been told in chronological order rather than bouncing around. Not everything about this movie is bad, but it could of been much much better. I did like seeing how things were behind the scenes. I noticed a lot of reviewers complaining about how Lucy was depicted. We have to remember that Lucy Ricardo was NOT the same person as Lucille Ball. Lucille Ball played a part, and she played it well. But just because her character was ditzy, kind, and lovable doesn't mean Lucille was too. In fact, Lucie Arnaz said it was a very accurate depiction of her mother's personality. All in all, this movie is definitely a flop for me. With better pacing and casting, it would of been much much better.

Lolita is definitely a misunderstood piece of art. It's not a love story nor a glamorization of pedophilia, it's a tragedy. We see Dolores Haze being stripped of her innocence and her childhood stolen away from her. We see a 12 year old being treated like a woman. We see HH try to justify his actions, knowing that he can't. HH is a disgusting, vile, pedophile. He knows this and regrets everything in the end. I'm glad he dies remorseful but it can never make up for what he put Dolores through. Quilty, who is equally as disgusting, is a perfect foil for HH. He hates Quilty for the same reasons he should hate himself. Through this hatred, I think HH not only realized that he himself is a P.O.S but that Dolores deserved nothing that the both of them put her through. She never had the chance to be a child. I couldn't help but cry at the end. None of these tears were for HH. All of the were for Dolores. I was a "lolita" myself. It came to light that we both had something in common, our childhood was destroyed. This book isn't meant to leave us sympathetic for the narrator. No. It's for all of the Lolitas out there in the world. To tell our story, to push the blame onto our abusers rather than us.

If you're looking for a show similar to Ball's "I Love Lucy" this isn't it. Her children are talented in many ways but acting wasn't their strong suit. They are in almost every episode and had a strong influence on the show at the time. In return, you get corny outdated jokes. That's why writers should never ever overuse slang! It's funny now but in 30 years it will just fall flat. The plots of the episodes are either interesting or just straight up weird. I Love Lucy was funny because the situations Lucy got herself into were goofy yet realistic. Here's Lucy takes that to another level. Lucille Carter, a secretary, goes on secret government missions from time to time. It would be funny if it happened in one episode but there's MANY episodes with this plot. Oh, and the random celebrity appearances too. Her children are dragged along, even during these crazy episodes and it makes it even more aggravating. In between, there are some genuinely funny and wholesome episodes but there isn't much going on here honestly. I really don't recommend this show if you're not into corny jokes and amateur acting.