SUSAN CROLL

I just saw Peacock yesterday 3-19-24. I didn't know anything about Cillian Murphy until I saw Oppenheimer. Therefore, I wanted to see him in another role. His acting was amazing as he switched from the insecure John to the very secure and manipulative Emma. I was amazed at how beautiful Cillian was as a woman. Those high cheekbones were a real plus. His entire body language changed with each character. I felt his pain as John and knew he was an abused child, which many times manifests in multiple personalities as a defense mechanism. It was a sad story indeed. My interpretation of the end when you realize how dangerous Emma's personality is...She looks at all of the family photos and could have murdered her little boy along with Maggie. However, something clicks quickly for her and realizing how dangerous she truly is, makes sure that Maggie and Jake get out of the house, away from her...Her one redeeming act! Then she locks herself in the house and sits on the chair her mother sat on, shoes off. This part reminded me of movie "Psycho." Kudo's to Cillian Murphy!

It didn't compare to the version with Orson Welles. A brooding version that left one constantly questioning what the big mystery was in that behemoth mansion. Questioning Rebecca's influence over everything and everybody. This version didn't do that for me although I have read it is more authentic to the book in what the author wants you to know. Armie Hammer played the part which didn't ask for much acting prowess. But that is what the character was, unassuming, wealthy, troubled by the past and a weak character. Lily James who is a multi-talented actress didn't thrill me in her part at all...couldn't relate. Kristin Scott Thomas as Mrs Danvers completely immersed herself in the character and was Excellent.