Interpret at your own risk...
There is great reason for all the controversy surrounding Joker: this movie does not TELL us what to think. We are faced with our own interpretations, our own moral concepts. It’s not a comfortable situation to be in. One opinion that I absolutely disagree with is that the movie is dishonest. Exaggerated, yes, but the spotlight on the failure of early intervention to those struggling with obvious mental health decline, the brutal ignorance of blatant signs that an individual is dangerously close to the edge, is not that far off from the bullseye. The director does not necessarily ask for sympathy for Arthur Fleck a.k.a. Joker. It’s the cringing feeling that you do sort of pity him out of your own obligation that causes the moral dilemma. Sure, we see Arthur’s hopeless life, ceaseless tormenting, and pathetic inner turmoil unfold before our eyes (Joaquin Phoenix is stripped of ALL decency), but the entire film is left to individual introspection, which is a lost concept to a culture who turn to any form of media for direction on what to feel or think. Joker doesn’t do that. A jarring volt of violence happens with no resolution. Senseless acts occur out of pure psychosis. No one there to tell us it’s going to be ok. No Batman to fight for justice. This movie views more like a dramatized depiction of “inside the mind of a serial killer,” complete with an uncensored story of childhood abuse. Joker definitely gives off Scorcese-Tarantino-Lynch vibes without apology. Reminders of gritty NYC circa late 70s/80s are everywhere, and I could imagine David Berkowitz planning his own victim list in a near-by apartment. Joker is jarring and disparate, no one is there to wrap things up in a pretty package. It’s bleakness leaves you reeling. And in a superficially obsessed society, it almost feels like piece of high art.