The movie does not go far enough to explain what is significant about how the pictures and description are
1. Related and unrelated to the postulate on a theoretical or real/physical basis.
2. Have you tried showing it to children, even young ones?
3. We see testing and observation going on but not the results, good, bad or indifferent. Titillating but not drawn out far enough
4. Why no Mention of some big mistakes such as Newtonian physics vs quantum mechanics and reativity? Why no mention of Dirac, who had nothing but pure math to help him? No empirical data until years later? How can that be explained?
MAKE A SEQUEL or series of them.