Susan J. Richards

I chose a 4 because I believed it deserves better than a 3. For some reason, since I entered my seventies, I like binging disaster movies (really don't know why). So I have watched,or partially watched some truly BAD ones! This actually had a plot, reasonably good actors, and fairly well written dialogue. The graphics were average, but not awful like movies with plastic monsters 😁. If you want a movie to pass the time and simply entertain, this will do that; if you're looking for cutting edge science and award winning actors and intellectual dialogue... don't choose this. Personally, in the pandemic, I watch a lot of the first. I don't want to think about the state of the world, I don't want to cry over sad things (or the state of the world), I don't want intense romance that won't fit in my current life. I just want to be entertained in between the books I read(yes, I tend to choose books like I do movies 🙃). Authors can't write fast enough for someone reading one or two books a day, so I also stream tv and movies.

Not sure why it received bad reviews, I quite enjoyed it, and never had a dull moment. Usually I play solitaire while I'm watching things... not with this. Of course, we seniors are used to real urban fantasy/sci fi... maybe you have to grow up on Asimov, Heinlein, Clarke, McCaffrey, add in some Jim Butcher, Ilona Andrews, Patricia Briggs, and then season it with Michael Anderle to appreciate this movie. I thought Will Smith did a great job, as usual, playing a disolutioned cop. It was nice to see urban fantasy that was not a horror movie (somebody really doesn't know what sci-fi is), horror is horror period. Glad they plan a sequel!! 👍

Amazing!!! Breathtaking photography! Not sure that there are enough words to say more.

I was surprisingly pleased. Not always a big Will Ferrell fan, but seriously enjoyed this. None of the characters actually played their"normal" roles, but the acting was impressive. The plot was well done, and I loved the ending.