Extremely unbalanced. The writers found a way to name drop many current relevant republicans as if they were somehow intimately involved in a case from 1998. Those that actually were involved are made out to be nothing shy of racist radicals. The writers favorable bias towards the left speaks loud and clear in their blurry distortion of a historical event that is backed by facts. They did not hold back on making up conversations that no one was privy to over hearing to make their narrative more favorable.