Mahanayakudu review by Divakar
After watching first part and its results, everyone would have low expectations . So I felt this movie is better than first part.
Movie starts in 1983 and ends in 1985.
Plus points of the movie r balakrishnas acting, there is some drama which is missing in the first part, some emotional scenes in this part, there is a villain too, shown ups and down of NTR life during that period, Good background music and couple of songs. No much controversies.
On the flipside, abrupt ending, dialogues should have been given more importance, made congress and Indiramma as villan(which may not go well with audience as now TDP and Congress r going together in current politics) ,at times it is shown CBN have better vision than NTR which may not go well with hardcore NTR fans, few good schemes introduced by him should have been given more importance and more weightage in the movie but schemes passed away as a passing clouds in the movie. What is the problem, why he had introduced those schemes and impact of it, should have been added to glorify NTR character.
Sachins acting is good, Rana and the person who acted as dagupati Venkateswarlu had done well. Keeravanis music is the saving grace in the movie.
Totally this movie also failed to reach audience low expectations also. I don't know the facts that happened during that period, so I don't comment on those things. Don't expect CBN vs NTR episode as the movie ends in 1985 itself. CBN fans and hard core TDP fans may like this movie.