Interesting as the panellists on your programmes are the very topics discussed are not completely satisfactorially concluded. For example the uestion of C limate C hange has not been fully impartially presented. David G seems to have a personal crusade. The question I would like all parties to discuss concerns Planet Earth - how many believe that Earth has evolved to its end stage; I believe it is still evolving since its beginnings with The Big Bang. There have been many changes that have been noted to have had effect as climate changes. It was the accumulation of oxygen that brought about the growth of all living matter and progressive evolution. Man-made CO2 levels ; of the 40% increase quoted can not be the sole cause of Global Warming. The less than 2 cm of man-made Co2 level added to the preexisting depth encircling Planet Earth in the Stratosphere could hardly account for the warming. The Ice melting at the poles and Himalayas is doing so because of Natures homeostasis rather than increasing warmth; c/f ice melting in in your favourite drink. It could be that man-made activities are straining nature's homeostasis, not necessarily because of CO2 levels. Politicians, Climatologists have grabbed onto unchallengable concept for their own preferred stance. How do you see this?