I was really dissatisfied by the physical depiction of prophet Muhammad which could have been easily avoided, if the story is concerned it’s not neutral rather a biased approach it’s hard to separate truth from falsehood, yes lady was not given fadak but the reason according to umer and abubkar was for the welfare of an empire just born to feed its people not for their own private life, historically both caliphs lived a humble and modest life this film depicts them as savages when they weren’t even black they had fair complexions and were taller the way they have depicted them and Ayesha is awful, Omer never burned the house of Fatima that who false narrative was made up in 10th century research on it if it was true why was it not in the books ? The fact is these were the best friends of prophet Muhammad and how muslims are portraying the company of their prophet is sad. Like they were just like isis. If Omer snd abubakar were like this Ali won’t have stayed loyal to them, or haven’t have served as a deputy of Omer during his caliphate. Yes lady fatima was angry on them because of fadak nothing more than that, and Ali too for 6 months because he was not involved in election of the new caliph after which abubkar apologised and Ali forgave him, you have distorted history shown fatima as a helpless victim and Ali as someone who couldn’t even defend his pregnant wife God forbid just so you could depict friends of prophet as savages.