A startling number of episodes revolving around sensitive issues are framed as trying to debunk the current societal norm or view of a topic while presenting a lot of false, dishonest information that is either unsourced or misrepresenting the source if sources are even shown and the stances he takes are usually the current norm anyway whether each individual agrees or not. He's stance on issues isn't incorrect or wrong its the way its went about as honesty is the key word here. Also I get its probably done for comedic effect but no one wants to learn from someone who is coming across as a giant, smug butthole which is super counter-intuitive to the point of the show.