GUNDAMDragon Lord

Brainwashy film about divorce. The hidden message in this film is Divorce. The king and queen are not getting along. They become monsters all because they were arguing in a forest. The daughter spent an entire year of them being monsters. The daughter wants to change them back but how? GET THIS They embark on a journey to rekindle the light they once had. The memories of them together happy. But plot twist. They don't want to be together even though the things they did together made them remember. They want nothing to do with each other. This is such a dumb plot. Great Voice Actors great designs. But these things need a plot for the movie to be good. A Divorce at the end of the film is just a big middle finger. Divorce is a hard topic to bring up in a PG film. It also makes parents who paid for Netflix question each other. This film while pretty and colorful with good voice acting, but it's tones are way to far left if you ask me. I feel like a Liberal who has no knowledge on families who are going through Divorce. Because lemme tell you it's not a princess in a castle trying to get their monster parents turned back to humans.

So far I enjoyed it. If you like Blue Dragon, you'll most likely enjoy DAIMA. Both are most certainly worth checking out. Trust me when I say this. Watch "Blue Dragon Opening theme song. THEN!!! Watch Dragon Ball DAIMA Opening theme song. Not kidding it's practically the same. See for yourself if you don't believe me. Except Blue Dragon came out in 2006. I will however take away 1 star From Dragon Ball Daima. Because it's very on the nose identical / similar to Blue Dragon. In terms of being more original. Which makes me enjoy Blue Dragon a lot more. That's just me. Any of the lower reviews will express their distaste on DAIMA specifically because "All the characters looks like babies" Most of the Emphasis is not so much how good DAIMA is in terms of plot, visuals, and more. Which IMO lacks a constructive review. For me at the very least least. If you didn't enjoy Blue Dragon. Then Dragon Ball DAIMA may not be for you.

1. People rarely if ever actually host or join a hosted mission, quest. 80% of the player base sit, idle, afk in the online lobbies. 2. Customization is the only selling point for this game. The gameplay mechanics itself was not a priority. And it shows. 3. The story is trash, it ignores 45 years worth of source material. It tries way to hard to lean more towards Gundam Build Fighters series the most. Followed by the after thought of G-Gundam. If you are expecting a Gundam game that is somehow linked or tied to the Manga / Anime. I did go through the whole story without skipping. I just don't recommend it. The depiction of each scene goes as follows. "Static busts of the actual character on a small screen next to the dialog box (Only Mouth moves)" "Gunpla's using the limited total of seven Emotes built into the game to show expressions as the story progresses" This is the experience you will have as you progress throughout the story. Lazy. And Basic. 4. Combat lacks in a lot of fields. Firstly maps are really small. Each mission has 3 phases. You'll bump the edge or corner in each mission at least once or twice each phase. In each phase, Gunpla spawn, you fight, more spawn, you fight, some gunpla's are treated as a mini boss. Then you go onto the 2nd phase and repeat. 3rd phase is the same leading into a "Final Boss" of that mission. Combat is just flat out repetitive and boring. After 60 hours you'll find the game repetitive. 5. Stats, Abilities, lack flavor text. There isn't any detailed explanation on what certain abilities and stats do. Zero information that tells you what "Wild Dance" does. For example. The game has it's own description and take on specific abilities and stats. So even if you are used to JRPGs, or MMO's the stats in Gundam Breaker 4 lacks an in depth description. You have to rely on 3rd party websites such as YT to get a better understanding as to what certain stats and ability effects does. And even when you get an idea it's still a bit confusing. 6. Online is basically dead. Sure at the time of writing you have 1000+ active players according to steam charts. But 80% of them are not actually playing the game. roughly 20% is actually playing the game, as in doing missions. If you host a mission it'll be a while before someone joins. That's if someone joins. The player base is dropping with each passing week and that's normal. But about 2 weeks after release hardly anyone wants to host or join a mission. Not making this up. So if you do get this game. Don't expect a lively active ready to play player base. (Overall the game is mostly negative to me.) With all things considering. The only saving grace it has is the fact that there are over 250 model kits. And you can mix match parts customize colors, and basically cosmetically give your gunpla a makeover. That's literally it. Gameplay is meh, Online was pretty much dead on sight. Story was the worst I've ever witnessed. Cutscenes are extremely basic and low effort. Using the in games emote system is a total joke in itself for the game to convey each cutscene. No I don't recommend it. Unless if all you care about is Customizing a Gunpla.

I feel like this is one of those games that was intended for a female demographic and made it the most mundane dull thing ever. Because Companies think women are dumb, Or can't enjoy something that is high quality and provide a great / challenging experience. It comes off as Babies first LoZ game. Intended for this generation of kids and young adults. I rather play something with Morals and Values. "I'm going back to Black Myth Wu Kong"

Funny Funny at first But at halfway mark. The humor devolves and or is repeated. Some of the jokes feel the same where emotions are conflicted with another emotions dialog. Family - Friendliness There are moments, and depictions where I strongly feel like it should be a pg13 film. Storyline This film doesn't even know what Anxiety even means. The "Character Anxiety" This is not how someone who is suffering from Anxiety works. Puss N Boots 2 deals with Anxiety 10x better. "Anxiety is a feeling of fear, dread, or uneasiness that can be a normal response to stress. It's a natural response to feeling threatened, and can be experienced through thoughts, feelings, and physical sensations." "Anxiety" Just wants to be friends with the popular cool kid. Which is the exact opposite of Anxiety. It's poorly done. Visuals The standard "DISNEY" but really Pixar that's doing the heavy lifting. Not like we haven't seen this stile done for nearly 15 years. Meh. Realisticness Again Anxiety (Character) is incorrectly depicted as a character I suffer from Social Anxiety. And while it's different from person to person. I think most can agree this is not relatable in any way. Thought Provoking What I find strange the most is how the old emotions were accepting of the new emotions. Yet the new emotions just wanted to get rid of the old ones. They were quick to exile the original emotions for no reason at all. Anxiety as a construct comes off as Selfish. Story Hockey, New Team, Best Friends or Popular friend, Emotions fighting for control, Pacing It's too fast paced, characters and plot direction is all over the place like baby enjoying dinner while also throwing it at any given chance. Watch Value I think I am good. But I have a strong feeling that Disney is going to ride this like they did with Toystory. Soon we'll get Inside out 4 where Riley is a edgy teenage going to college or whatever. Inside out 5 where Riley is an adult with kids. To me it's just going to be a predictable film. Engagement It's a slog. The only interesting components are the emotions at best. Originality It's Inside Out but TWO!!!!! Very original. It's pretty much the same as the first one. But instead of Sadness and Joy having differences and overcoming them. It's 4 new emotions of the same plot. Literally. Overall, Film poorly depicts Anxiety as a real life emotion, It honestly feels like the same as the original but with 3 extra steps added on for flair / wow factor. I watched this film ignoring trailers and any information about the film. I wasn't hyped for it. I came in with a neutral mindset. And I personally didn't like the film. 1/5 The 5 star reviews are bots BTW. I am a real person btw, who did watch this and wrote this review myself.

This is an insult to Stephen Hillenburg, creator of Spongebob. He is rolling in his grave not happy. While this abomination was being produced. What a disgrace.

As a kid. Who rented Princess Mononoke at a Blockbuster video store. Late 90s. Being my first awakening to Studio Ghibli and enjoying their films as the years went on. Going back to watch the older ones too!!! However to me The Boy and the Heron was a miss for me. Watched it, was very confusing and hard to follow. Scenes that were important were cut short. Scenes that were just filler were dragged on into a slog. Keep in mind I had a very neutral mindset, and I avoided any promotion that may spoil or give away any of the plot. The Heron shows up once in a while for a very short period of time similar to the Cheshire cat in Alice in Wonderland. To me the title of "The Boy and the Heron" felt misleading. A lot of key components within the film just made no sense. Felt like a Fever dream. The introduction of these Parakeet antagonists just felt VERY out of place, random. And just outright out of nowhere. It's hard to describe it. Like the film leaves out information until the last 30 minutes of the film. While prior you get some sort of a sample as to what is going on visually. It's only until towards the end it all makes sense. To me the best part of the film was the visuals with the Flames and fire, and how Mahito was running at the very beginning of the film. The worst part is how quickly Mahito refers to Natsuko as mother very early in the relationship. It's worth mentioning that she and him known eachother for a week at most!! I wish there was a bit more of a buildup where it left a stronger impact. But the interaction between Mahito and Natsuko felt rushed. I love lore and Studio Ghibli is known to make great work with creating an immersive experience in all of their films. However to me a lot of the lore in this film was mostly "Word to mouth" first, then visually expressed, only to go back into "word to mouth" It was all over the place. 2 out of 5. On a good day. 3 out of 5. I didn't enjoy it. And I can say it's certainly not Ghibli's best.

This is just Fosters Home For Imaginary Friends. . It's heavily flawed. Kids will love it MAAAAAYBE?!?! But the thing is that me looking at this as an adult. Kids will find this film boring. The pacing is a slog, it drags on!!!!! 30 minutes in and we get something!!!! But then it goes back to being a slog again. For me the biggest issue is the 12 year old character who is dressed like someone you'd see in the 1970s or 1980s. Her outfits are heavily dated for a film that looks like it takes place in modern day 2024. I am willing to bet a lot of people are reading this and realizing this too, Like "Wait a second!" 5 star reviews are bots, don't buy into it. At least read the 3 star reviews because they're willing to point out the flaws. And you decide from there. For me it's a 1 star because it's boring, flawed, with dated outfits that no 12 year old would wear, also it's strange that it's never depicted or explained where her manners came from. She is just to polite and nice. Just going off her parents who are carefree and lets her do whatever tell all kinds of stories and what not. Her personality doesn't match how she was raised, at least how the film proceed with the characters from the start. 20 minutes of the movie is her being in some apartment in New York with her grandma, and visiting her dad in the hospital. While yes you need to start the film somewhere. The pacing is just way to slow.

It tries way to much to do what the original did. There is a specific aesthetic that the 1971 version has that the others don't. This lacks dark tones. It's too childlike. It tries way to much to play safe the tones to me just seems like it doesn't want to go outside the box. It want's to remain itself in a jar. And try to capitalize on the original concept. I don't understand why we're including black characters that were never black in the original. The continuity of a "Black Slugsworth" makes zero sense. I am not racist by any means. I just don't like Race swapped characters that are established as white now black. Think of it like this. Would you want a White Martin Luther King Jr? No you wouldn't!!!! Now you know how I feel. Keep the characters race original. I actually love things like Static Shock, and prefer the black Green Lantern. If those characters in 2035 were portrayed white I would be upset the same what I am now. Race isn't the issue. It's more or less a checkbox. TBH if I was someone who is POC I wouldn't be happy with the race swap as it's drive and purpose is to appeal to someone who is "POC" for the sake of a Ticket / view. Disney does this a lot with Races, Insert movie, Insert Race, Insert Disney Princess. It's all a checkbox. Those who don't accept the fact are those who are the demographic of "It's not hurting anyone" They're using you brother. IDK what else to tell you. They're also sexist. To me this film is what I would consider a Hollywood checkbox. Orphan Black Poor Rich A Dream tackling the Greedy It's an insult to the film industry. Watch the film and tell me it doesn't have some sort of propaganda or altered motivation.