Quite evident these judges like all the rest are on the take. Perhaps they are myopic as well. They certainly came across as looking foolish choosing the bull dog over a field which had the best golden retriever in some time. These shows are just a means for breeders to further their business. That's why the popular breeds don't win. Those breeders don't need a push for business. It's the relatively unpopular breeders who need to pay the judges for a win. Thereby increasing the demand for their dogs ie $$$$$. Wouldn't it be a great move to make the judging transparent by showing us the point total for the dogs. Or how they judge in points and the basis for that.