Chris Clarke – Google

Nothing new about this film really. Takes far too long for any real shocks or edge of the seat moments. And when they eventually come, they're not as shocking or edge of the seaty as you had expected. The ending . . . WOW !!! There are "cliff-hangers" and there are "open for future films endings", this is neither, both and everything all at once. The ending ruins the whole experience. Too many unanswered questions. "Did she, didn't she ?" "What happened to the stepdad, after he was, apparently, bitten ?" "WHY, in God's name, can a Warewolf NOT bite through a plaster-cast, when, I imagine, even some domestic dogs can do it successfully ?" (RIDICULOUS) Hate to put a downer on the director. The writers are to blame here !! Get your own ideas !! Could've been called "A Norwegian Warewolf in Norway.(or whatever country it was set) !?" If its your first foray into "Warewolves", I s'pose you could do worse, but this film takes a hell of a lot of its ideas from "An American Warewolf In London." "Viking Warewolf" begins in a similar way to "AAWIL" with strangers in an unfamiliar, small, fairly isolated area & one of them is a survivor of what appears to be a strange and unknown animal attack. Those of you that have seen "AAWIL" will recognise the visits from the deceased of the afore mentioned "strange, unknown animal attack." Although they do not grow in absurdity and Gore, with each visit, unlike "AAWIL". Which accomplishes showing the loss of sanity to the, rapidly growing "Wolf within" in a far better and entertaining way. Overall this film is so-so ! I can't slag it off completely, as it had some reasonably good moments, but it really does unashamedly steel most of its plot and action sequences from "AAWIL". My advice is to watch "AAWIL" instead and see how it was done 40 or so years ago. The animation and special effects may not have been up to today's standard, but somehow "AAWIL" does it sooooo much better.

This is the film I've waited for !! Since discovering my favourite superhero at the age of 7 !!! I am now 46. I have been and will, hopefully always be a massive Spidey fan, in all his and "her" guises, even the useless 1970's spidey with the 70's mullet and awful clothing. 😄 I remember seeing the first Tobey Maguire spiderman and believing it would never be surpassed and twice more it was. Then in stepped Andrew Garfield and the writers took spidey on a different yet similar path and then, just as it can't possibly get better, comes Tom Holland and, yet again, the whole story is given a new, yet familiar route. This film showed off excellent acting. Excellent special effects and above all else, excellent writing !! I cannot praise this film , ALL its forerunners and every single designer, writer, producer, actor, director etc. that took part in the build up to this 'truly awesome' culmination of the modern Spidey storey, enough ! For everthing you have given us comic book fans, over these past 25 or so years . . . A Great Big THANKYOU !!! I can't wait for Spidey and Venom to meet again !!! This time is gonna be sooooooo much better !!?!!🤞 Thanks for keeping me as 'a child at heart'. The work you've done and continue to do is more important than you know !! KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK !!!🕷👍