Greg C.

I thought it was a fairly lame movie; a lot of reused material. But when I went to see it I didn't know it was aimed at a younger audience. Nor was I aware of the rating at the time. (PG-13) So hopefully the kids enjoyed it more...

I give it 3 B's: Bland beyond belief! After I had read some good reviews I thought I'd check it out. The main female character constantly grinds on your nerves and the rest of the cast is boring as hell (as is the story). I think the combo director/writer of this movie needs to re-learn his trade. Interesting enough this movie somehow reminds me of another one called 'It Follows!'. But that movie was quite good. And 'It Follows' had a smaller cast, smaller budget, and was shorter in length (20+ min less). 'Midsommar' is being compared to the 'The Wicker Man' and I will agree on that one. But 'Midsommar' just insults the viewer in every way possible. $23 wasted on this movie (drink+pizza) because I listened to good reviews. Shame on you reviewers! I then watched 'BrightBurn' at a cheaper theater and was pleasantly surprised. But after watching 'Midsommar' anything would be good to my senses!

A fairly simple movie that surprised me by having a story line. I had presumed it was but a hack and horror job. I will note that I had watched it at a discount theater; so that helps me by giving it a good review. (At a main full cost theater - pass on watching this!!)

I really enjoyed it. And it definitely has rated R content. But I wonder if these 'boys' will regret being in this movie when they actually grow up. (I would be!)

Great title and Jamie lee Curtis was awesome. I kept thinking to myself; "That isn't her..is it?" Otherwise I sort of liked the movie. The problem was the movie kept repeating itself. Who's fault is that? The writer? Or the producer; " We need a longer movie for any sort award consideration." And are all movies under 2 hrs long considered to be B type movies? A shame if that's true. It is also a dismay to see so many positive reviews on a movie that has 1 -2 bad things about it; shame on you movie "critics".

This movie was horrible beyond belief. It was as if they threw a bunch of scenes together and called it a 'movie'. Whoever wrote and/or directed this mess should permanently leave the western genre. And how is it that all these great actors (in this movie) couldn't recognize horrid crud? What a waste of my time.

The popcorn was more enjoyable than this movie, and the popcorn suxed!

Great title and Jamie lee Curtis was awesome. I kept thinking to myself; "That isn't her..is it?" Otherwise I sort of liked the movie. The problem was the movie kept repeating itself. Who's fault is that? The writer? Or the producer; " We need a longer movie for any sort award consideration." And are all movies under 2 hrs long considered to be B type movies? A shame if that's true. It is also a dismay to see so many positive reviews on a movie that has 1 -2 bad things about it; shame on you movie "critics".