Ian

Aquaman had outstanding visuals, and action scenes, but there was one thing that bothered me. The only black characters in the entire movie were brutal pirates. I usually don't complain about this sort of thing but this caught my attention. Overall I think Aquaman was still a good movie.

The movie sets up the rest of the trilogy well, but there are a few things wrong with star wars the phantom menace. 1: Jarjar binks- OOOOG, I can't stand him, so annoying and turned out stupid. 2: Kinda boring, not enough action sequences. Some things that were GOOD about star wars 1. 1: Darth Maul- one of my favorite characters in the first 3 movies, not at all bland. 2: Pod race was unique and cool

I think I liked the music better without the creepy animations.

Simply put, the plot was too random and aimed for younger kids mostly unlike TLM1. Also, 70% of the new characters are based on kiddy feminine legos, which only the young girls like. So the movie is only supposed to appeal to a small portion of the audience. Only 5% of the legos in TLM2 were actually cool, 4% of that is Rexs technology. (but he turned out to be a bad guy, AAAA) TLM2 is kiddy and a disgrace compared to TLM1.

Rogue One is definitely one of my favorite star wars movies, especially after the disaster of The Force Awakens. (next to SW 5, 6, and 8) The plot is interesting and unique, with special characters with unique abilities. It fits like a puzzle piece into the original series. All three battles on all three major planets are unique and exciting. I was impressed at how well the costumes and storm trooper scenes were done. Darth Vader was introduced into the movie well and had his own special battle scene at the end of the movie that demonstrates his power. The only bad thing about the movie was the occasional unnecessary script.

When I first saw the force awakens in theaters, I was blown away and excited about it. But shortly after I noticed errors in the plot and didn't approve of the movie. One thing they DID get right was the scenes, decorations, and costumes. But here are some reasons The Force Awakens gets a thumbs down. 1: REALLY, ANOTHER DEATH STAR! The Star Wars franchise is one of the most important movie series of all time, and Abrams just decided to copy A New Hope. The story is irrelevant, especially when the third death star was introduced. "Oh boy another death star. Lets go blow it up, piece of cake." Why not an interesting new plot that no one can predict. Nope. Just had to screw up and be lazy with the plot. 2: Where did Snoke come from? He's just some random force weilder who owns the First Order. His significance as a character is almost 0. He has no past, just intentions on ruling the galaxy. I hope future star wars movies give him significance or bring back the emperor. 3: Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think in star wars Legends the emperor returns as a clone of his original self and the Empire rises again. Hey! There's a plot that could have been used instead of the copy of a new hope. 4: The stormtroopers looked kind of dumb. If the original stormtroopers were made of clay, the new ones are smoothed down and rounded, having no interesting features whatsoever. 5: What would George Lucas say? Would he approve of the plot? He's been such a good storyteller and now the new Force Awakens takes his story, copies it, and puts it somewhere else in the timeline. Abrams did a much better job with star trek.

(Slight spoilers) Avengers Engame was very thrilling, action packed, and had good stretches of comedy. But if I was in charge of it all, things would be much different. The plot goes in a good direction, but definitely not the best. Here are some reasons I think Endgame was a little disappointing. 1: When I went to the movie theater to see Endgame a few days after release I expected it to be intense, a little dark, and make an impression on the Marvel characters. But as the plot went forward the only characters that died were iron man and black widow. I feel like the Marvel heros always defeat every enemy that's thrown at them without a sweat. The final battle should have been a challenge. How could no one be killed in that war zone. Seems like Thanos was just another moron that needed to be killed. The final battle ended just like all the others. (with the exception of iron man) More heros should have died to make Endgame significant. 2: Hulk and Thor were completely ruined. Hulk was turned into this green scientist helper. His whole character was about being two different people, one a genius scientist, the other a raging monster. The two sides of Banner give him a special place among the Avengers. Now both those characters were killed when the Russo brothers tried to merge them. When the Yin and Yang is mixed, it turns into a dull, gray color. The same is true for the Hulk. Thor is a completely new person in Endgame. The drunkness makes sense, but the belly turned him into nothing but a laughing stock. I guess immortals have physical health as well. (Wait! That makes him mortal, right!) That topic may be up for debate, but I still think Thor was ruined. All of Thors heroism was stripped from him in the new character. Other minor disappointments: All of the characters that came back had very minor roles. They appeared for about 2 seconds and then the scene goes to other characters. I think killing some more of the Marvel heros may have solved this. Infinity War made an impression because half the characters died. It proved that the Avengers aren't invincible and that Thanos is a difficult foe. This is just my opinion. Idk maby I'm just being picky. I can completely understand why anyone else would like Endgame and it did have ups and downs.