Star

How come when mj was at his court case in '93 and '05, he was so innocent but it's different now? It should be different it's the same with different people. Just because they did a 3 hour documentary with a one sided story doesn't mean that he is guilty. You have to think about it. And if you do your research, James Safechuck story wasn't even chronologically correct. And Wade Robson story never stays the same. I know it took a while for me to respond, but that's because I did my research. And I'm not doing this because I'm a fan. It's because I want to stand for and promote honesty. It's the right thing to do. So now I know for a fact that he is innocent. And I also know how to except the truth so if you stand for truth and innocence, thumbs down the😘street doc. And p.s if MJ tried to f*** him in the a** then wouldn't he have had some type of HIV or AIDS?