Jay T

I enjoyed the movie for its scientific accuracy, powerful acting, imaginative yet down to earth vision for the future of space exploration, and most of all, its message. It seems like the human cost of space exploration is often overlooked. As the film suggests, one can only imagine the silent void in our vast surroundings, and the almost obsession one must have to go through the loneliness it imposes. However, such visions could also blind one to what it already has, being slowly driven to madness. In the age of rapid expansion and development of our species, maybe it would be beneficial to slow down, look at what we're neglecting and treasure what we have. It could be applied to an individual who is abandoning its loved ones for its mission, or our society as a whole which might be damaging our environment for development. It seems like quite some people think the film has some major physics inaccuracies, to which I disagree with. (1) Brad Pitt fell in the beginning because he wasn't in an orbit, if the ISS suddenly stopped moving in orbit it would most likely have fallen down too. (2) Because of the moon's low gravity, the spinning jump of the moon rover off the cliff could very well be as harmless as what happened in the film. (3) The nuclear blast shown was not fire, the white cloud was radioactive remnants of the nuclear fission from whatever the bomb was made of. They are extremely hot due to the high energy possessed, justifying their gaseous state appearance and bright white color of radiation. I don't know why I wrote all these, I just really don't understand why so many people disliked such a decent movie while giving 90% rating for stuff like Happy Death Day.