Michael Totten

I deleted my review from 2 years ago, to remove all the "spoilers", that I had put in it. Now it is 10/10/2022, and it is like more than 3 years since I first saw it, and at least 2 years, since I first reviewed it. What I really liked about this movie, was the story. And, not just what happened, but the clever way that the heroine in this movie succeeded, AND how the audience was allowed to follow, what was happening, as well. The scriptwriter was just as excellent, as her excellent acting, if not even a little better. This script fit her style, perfectly. Later on, I saw her in another movie (that she might've made earlier, than Peppermint), but it used fantasy--and for me, in most cases--that doesn't work. Peppermint, on the other hand, as unlikely a story as it is--it could happen. That other movie, however, uses a character (like a superhero), with unreal fantasy powers, that does not exist in reality. But Peppermint is a story, that could happen. And it uses modern day technology, to the fullest. It may never happen, but it is believable--and certainly finds the audience, cheering her on. I liked this movie, immensely, just like Wind River, Highwaymen, and Midway, 3 recent, great movies that I rate highly. See Peppermint; you, like the vast majority who saw it--will LOVE IT. And now, having watched it again on 11/10/24, I can say without a doubt that Wikipedia is wrong, as are all of the critics: this IS a good movie, and today I have enjoyed it again, for the sixth time, since 2018. The more often I watch it, the more I enjoy it, having watched it today with one of my guy buddies--and we both enjoyed it. This movie ain't for kiddies, women or nice guys--but for rough n tumble guys like us--it is good. And I also enjoyed the unspoken but obvious condemnation of the liberal and corrupt justice system, that exists now in CA (thanks to the liberals!) But very glad that our great, conservative hero got elected a few days ago--who believes in effective law enforcement, and border control. CA is a mess right now--and most Americans can see it. That is one reason why the "heartland" voted for the right man--instead of the left. And why did all the lib media critics pan it? Because it clearly depicts CA crime waves, homelessness, and lib-failing courts.

Yeah, there were some flaws in the corny script and story. However, the music in the background was quite good, and the video of aerial combat was the best that I have EVER seen in any movie. What other movie depicts a hundred Flying Fortressses, flying in formation--while Messerschmitts are zooming in and out of their formation, and cutting them to pieces, huh? (And all in COLOR, no less, too!) The cgi that Lucas put together here, is of Star Wars quality. And, regardless of the predictable character development, and rah-rah liberal propaganda--who can deny that these guys DID fight for us? And, how many other fighter groups got at least 96 DFC's? And, let's not forget that these great American heroes--often paid the ultimate price, and were KIA. So, this movie wasn't perfect--but, in reality--they fought (and some of them died) for our country and our freedom--and Lucas is doing the best he can, to pay tribute to them, through this movie (as we all should pay tribute to them, for their bravery and their sacrifices, for us.) Yes, there were some non-believable parts in the plot (like successfully escaping from Germany, in the woods, as an escaped POW)--but there can be no doubt that these fighter pilots (along with millions of others who served in all of our military)--contributed to our victory, in 1945.

I actually enjoyed this movie. Granted, it was no better than the recent version of Death Wish, with Bruce Willis, and not quite as good as Peppermint, with Jennifer Garner, or the Taken series, with Liam Neeson--but I still thought it was good, and I still enjoyed it. The ending was a little lame, but the action throughout was pretty good, because I like vengeance movies like these (and don't forget the gritty, but excellent vengeance movie, Four Brothers, either!) And, I also like the way that one "lead" leads to another, in the detective work tracking down the real criminals, here, in this movie, too. Everyone seems to want to make a good vengeance/vigilante movie these days, and I don't mind watching them. So, I give this movie 4 stars.

A little slow at times, but was a good movie. I loved the modern view, of the Old West, and the clear, logical explanation, of why and how, everything played out, the way it did. The music was excellent. The scenery, out in the wilderness, was excellent. Overall, I enjoyed it, quite a bit (not sure why I gave it 4, instead of 5 stars, because it was good). And those Sioux costumes were excellent, but, militarily, in real life, they would have wiped out, those small groups, of "pale faces". Yes, some of the action WAS unrealistic, hence my 4 out of 5 stars--but still good, anyway. And, I guess I must be the lone voice who enjoyed this movie, since every other review was negative, but then I like wilderness and camping, and grew up with it. And I enjoyed the view of all the topography, of the land, more than usual. And I understand, the Western way of life. But, some of the action, could have been simpler.

Having seen it now, 3 or 4 times, since I first saw it 2 years ago, I still find it quite an excellent film. And now I understand all the clues, and the sequence of events that reveal the clues and define the action. When I first saw it, I was stunned by the action, as well as the wilderness scenario and poverty and despair. But, knowing what is about to happen, I was now able to focus on the clues, and how the investigation played out, and why. It was just a great, great movie, that I would give ten stars to, not just 5 out of 5, if I could. As an Eagle Scout, I understand a lot of what was going on, in that winter wilderness. And, I was awestruck by the beautiful, yet very remote and desolate environment, and scenery. And I loved those big, handmade bullets, and their result! Yeah, it was a violent, horrible, upsetting crime. But it was followed by real, American justice, of the most fitting kind imaginable. And, I just really loved those 2 men, sharing at the end, as only 2 men who have both suffered in the same way, can appreciate being with each other, just talking, hanging out, and enjoying each other's company, man to man. Unlike many other movies, this movie had an ending that played all the way out, leaving me feeling good, about the ending. But, it's not a movie for kids. I don't think even any kid under 18, should watch this movie. Yet, as a full-grown adult of many, many years, I am able to appreciate this movie, without bring psychically destroyed by, some of it's nightmare scenes. And it does have a message, for all of us adults, and a sad testament, to the treatment, of all of our Native Americans.

I have just written a long review, of this movie, here on google--but google had mistakenly shifted me over to the 2019 Costner movie (which was good also), instead of putting me into the 2004 Caviezel movie, anything to distract or destroy, the work of this great actor, Jim Caviezel, for his courage, in acting in Sound of Freedom, and Paul Apostle of Christ, etc. What I like about him is his morality and his spirituality, in all of his movies. While the mainstream media has nothing but bad things to say about him and his work, audiences were standing up and cheering him, loudly, in Sound of Freedom! That is because the media is controlled by godless socialists, who run this country, now. And they can't stand a moral, strong and honest character, who is spiritually awakened, like Jim Caviezel. Neither can they stand, a great movie maker, like Dinesh D'Souza, or Mel Gibson, or even a historically accurate movie maker, likeRoland Emmerich, in the 2018 Midway movie. Anyway, go to my review of the 2019 movie, The Highwaymen, and you'll find my review of this 2004 movie, Highwaymen. I thought it was worth watching, and worth giving it 5 stars, too.

Yeah, it was gritty. Yeah, others would call it a "grade B" movie. But, I rather enjoyed it. Not as much, perhaps, as the great Hacksaw Ridge, or the patriotic Patriot, with Mel Gibson, or the excellent recent version of Midway, by Roland Emmerich--but I still rather liked it. In fact, I like all, of Jim Caviezel's work, as an actor, and as a man of God. And, in this movie, he has the help of a very beautiful woman, and an old, tired cop, to track down and put out of service, this maniacal serial killer. And, yes, the plot is a little implausible, but his acting, her beauty, and the toughness of that old cop, are still good, in tracking down and destroying this merciless killer. In that sense, this film has similar aspects to the isolated horror, of Steven King movies, so, perhaps the plot is somewhat implausible, but nonetheless interesting--with lots of action and plot twists, at the end. For me, it was better than the other dreck that I'd started watching, where the movie takes the side of the 3 worthless criminals, instead of these 3 heroes, working to destroy a criminal, as in this movie. From a moral standpoint, as difficult as it was to watch the horror, these 3 people did the right thing--and stood up to the evil--and won. And wikipedia gave it bad ratings, as that leftwing service always will rate a movie by the man who played Jesus in one movie, and Paul, in another. But, they were lying, as usual. The ratings here, from others, are much better than what wikipedia says, as usual. Frankly, I'm getting a little tired of all these movies that make the rich businessman the bad guy, and the radical student environmentalist, the good guy. And also getting tired of being lied to, by google, and having great movies like Death of a Nation or 2000 Mules, blocked or unavailable. I hear that audiences were standing up and cheering, for Sound of Freedom, but google has nothing but bad things to say, about Jim Caviezel. And Roku has another movie called Sounds of Freedom available to watch, not Sound of Freedom, which is unavailable, to distract or mislead people, from Jim Caviezel's great work, again. It's like we are in the middle of a propaganda war, here in the U.S., always in favor of the left wing socialists, who now run this country. yuk! This part of Jersey that I live in, and almost all of the media around here, are swamped by left wing socialists and Democrats. I wish that we could elect another Eisenhower or a Lincoln, and I pray that Trump gets elected again! These Democratic politicians, and socialists, are nothing more than pieces of sh*t liars, who are wrecking this country! P.S. google got me again-ergh! I was looking for reviews for Highwaymen, and they shunted me over to The Highwaymen, instead! Here I wrote this long review, about the 2004 Jim Caviezel movie, and now I realize that they only allow reviews for this 2019 Costner/Harrelson movie, instead! I also saw the 2019 movie, back in 2019, and I enjoyed it as well, particularly the American music from the bayou country and Texarkana music, from that area. But, all of my above review applies to the 2004 Jim Caviezel movie, Highwaymen, not this 2019 movie, and I recommend that others watch it, as well. I was wondering why google had so much higher ratings about this movie than wikipedia--now I know why--this is a totally different movie! I am really beginning to hate the left wing bias, of google!!!

Yeah, I will give it to you that the scenario depicted, in this movie, is unlikely, very unlikely--but I was still wrapped up in Gerard Butler's portrayal of Mike Banning--and all the action that followed. And, just for the record, I really enjoyed the next one, Angel Has Fallen, where Mike Banning, hinself, is the target, as well as the President. The action, in this movie, is what really GRABBED me. And, I've really got no complaints, about it, other than it's lack of realism. Of course, if you want realism, watch a movie like 1944, or The Battle For Sevastopol, 2 great movies with lots of action, that depict events that really DID happen.

This movie was EXCELLENT. But, I wonder WHY Google fucked up, and forgot to list the STAR of this movie, in the cast?!? The star and co-star, 2 stars in this movie, really, were Taraji P. Hanson, and Sam Rockwell, yet NOWHERE in Google's cast listing, can you find Taraji?!? What is WRONG with you, Google? Why, have you fucked up, again, and left out the name of the most famous black actress in Hollywood, today? This is a real insult, Google, and a total disgrace!!! Please correct this huge error, before I begin to really believe how RACIST, you are, Google!!!

So far, I'm still on Season 1, halfway thru the 3rd episode, and it is a fascinating sci-fi series, so far (but then, I only just started watching it, a few hours ago, for the very first time!) Yeah, I'm an old guy--I was fourteen when the original Star Trek series came out--but that doesn't mean that I can't appreciate good sci-fi. After all, I've read Destination Void, The War Against The Rull, and Ringworld, among many other great sci-fi books, of my era, including the original 1100 page hardcover of Dune, in the mid-1970's. This series, of which at least the first 2 seasons were written by Roddenberry, has been interesting, so far. I understand, from other reviewers, that later seasons devolve into Kevin Sorbo Hercules-type episodes, perhaps? However, I personally believe in the power and motivation of profit, in a free market society, in order to pay for all the wonderful social programs, that we have in this country, right, Stygian P? You can try strong government controls all you want, but they don't work. What we need, long before Trump came around, and long after he is gone, is a profit-motivated, free market, capitalist democracy, with freedom of speech, and assembly. Anything else, just won't pay, for all of our extensive social programs, that you and I benefit from, in this great country, right, Stygian? And if you think that that is a "straw man" argument, I suggest that you try living, in one of those wonderful places, where they have none of that.