If you loved the books like I did, you will not love the movie at all because it almost completely scrapped the book. Imagine taking Lord of the Rings, and then forcing King Arthur and Captain America into the story line and dropping Gandalf because he's "too old and stereotypical of wizards." This is sort of what happened. Basically, it isn't Madeline L'Engle's story, it's Ava Duvernay's story borrowing heavily on Madeline's for inspiration. If you're okay with knowing that, or you've never read the books then perhaps it's an okay movie. Even so, the trick of trying to impress an audience with sweeping CGI landscapes, distracting movement, and wide pan outs was the method heavily leaned on to sell it, even though it's old hat and not how to make a big box office hit anymore, this isn't the Independence Day/Titanic era and expectations are returning to good characters and subtlety. The creators and directors seemed to have missed the memo though. They completely changed everything just to be trendy and appeal to the fads of the moment, a lot of the fundamentals of each character were scrapped or contorted confusing the role they each played to create the story. Even critics have been too generous to say the actress chosen to play Meg was good, even though she really wasn't. Most of the acting was okay at best but usually felt forced and amateur like a budget Netflix series. I really wished they fleshed out Meg and Charles better, they were completely unrelatable and annoying. I really wished they stuck to Camazotz as a world profoundly enslaved by an evil force rather than a clumsy abstract allegory of evil in general. Why does only the Ms. character that Oprah plays feel wise while the other two feel foolish? Why did they turn the Happy Medium into this obnoxious, floopy guy? Some questions are better left unanswered.