Cody P – Google

Then game may start off slow but after the first couple of hours, it turned into one of the best games ever. There is a ton of stuff to do, random encounters to come across and planets to traverse. This game is about exploring and BGS made sure that was the core element. Some people complain about no manual take off and landing. Have you plays Elite Dangerous or Star Citizen? It gets old fast. Some people are complaining about the lack of planet to planet travel. This game simulated actual distance. It would take hours to travel from planet to planet. Light seconds (186,000 miles) and Astronomical Units (93,000,000 miles) are distance units in this game. You also don't have to go to the map to travel to your next mission destination. Look at the marker in your ship, press A (on Xbox) then X to travel. Maps are also a complaint. There is a surface map to refer to. It may not be good but it's there. You could also be not lazy and go to the information kiosks, signs or explore the cities. This game is not intended to hold your hand all of the way through. Put your big boy suit on and walk. The landscapes in this game are beautiful. I came across a moon that had the feel of the western US. It has red rock type land scape with a Monument Valley feel. Unfortunately I can't find it anymore. I will again on day. The ship designing is indepth and quite awesome. You can spend hours in the crafting and ship design systems. Over all, the game is not perfect but, it is fun. You can get lost in this game for hours just by walking around the cities. There is a ton of content in this game that will keep you busy until Elder Scrolls 6. Though it's not perfect, it has the perfect formula to be perfect and I cannot wait to see what BGS does with this game. If you don't like it, that's find, the game isn't for everyone. I will continue to play it and increase my 24hrs of play time into hundreds, if not thousands of hours. - safe travels, watch for pirates.

Most people leaving bad reviews are trying to compare this game to L4D as if it's a sequel. This game is not a sequel, it's a spiritual successor to the series. The game is fun but that doesn't mean it doesn't have flaws. The Good: Awesome graphics, the game looks very good Familiar play style since it is similar to L4D Replayability, it is a fun game Has solo and multi-player option (solo mode is literally marked as "solo campaign" underneath the multi-player play modes) The new shop is a new and cool idea Character customization (though limited) Weapon customization (again, limited) The Not So Good Special infected spawn too often Recoil seems too high Weapon damage doesn't seem enough AI is rather dumb. They sit there and stare at you while being attacked. Weapon attachments don't seem to do anything Game seems more difficult on multi-player for some reason. I played one level and passed no problem but just so happen to launch into a multi-player match with the same level but died twice even though the difficulty was the same. Overall it's a fun game, it just needs some tweaks. The card system isn't terrible though, it may be confusing. It does add perks to the gameplay. Again, this is not a LD4 game and should not be viewed as one.

I'm surprised this game has so many 5 star reviews!! I didn't preorder this game but I bought the game day one. I ran into multiple crashes and a game breaking bug 1st play through. The only fix was to restart the game over. CDPR ruined their reputation with this game. Many things have come to light such as devs creating a bug reel and the fact that they made a fake gameplay demo for E3 are one of the very few issues. This game needs a complete overhaul. I got rid of this game a few weeks after getting it. I will not buy this game again unless it's the game they showed at E3 and it's the game they promised which I will say, will never ever happen. I will refuse to buy anything from CDPR ever again. I hope that $20MN split between them executives was worth it because CDPR has a dark future ahead of them. There is nothing immersive about this game. It lacks story, immersion and.any narrative what so ever. This game was promised to "redefine the open world genre" when really it didn't do anything for thr genre. Skyrim, a now almost 10 year old game, has more immersion and story telling than this game will ever have. I will never ever recommend this game to anyone.

The movie was great and is an awesome improvement from the original movie. Many critics try to label this as a martial arts movie and it's not that, it's a movie based off of a video game. Warning, some plot spoilers from the movie and video game ahead: I only have very few maybe nitpicky complaints. The plot with Subzero and Shang Tsung never happened in the video game and even though Bi Han and Scorpion were enemies, Subzero never killed Hanzos family. In the video game, Subzero and Hanzo were hired by Quan Chi to retrieve Shinnoks amulet. They arrived at the same time and Hanzo was killed. In-between that, Quan Chi disguised himself as Subzero and he and the clan killed Hanzos clan and family. Hanzo (who is now Scorpion) killed Subzero as revenge. That whole plot point was reworked and they turned Subzero into a truly evil character when he was not inherently evil (not good either). There were some critics and people complaining about Cole. Cole was Warner Brothers decision, not the directors, producers or even writers choice. There was also complaints about there being talks of a tournament that never happened. The reason why is because Shang Tsung is breaking the rules of tournament and bypassing it. That's the reason why there is no tournament. All in all, it's a great movie. It looks like some of the critics and people are critiquing the movie without paying attention or even know anything about the video game.

Red Mists review is completely wrong and its pretty obvious he has not played any of the other ones as the controls, story and characters are all part of the series. Of course they would not change the controls or the story when its a continuation of Resident Evil 1 and 2. The controls are the same tank-like controls as the very first game and Resident Evil 2. Resident Evil 3 takes place during and after the events of 2 but after the events of 1 so the story is intertwined. Why would they change it if its a continuation of the first 2 games? Resident Evil 3 is highly popular and has been a fan favorite since it came out in 1999. The main antagonist "Nemesis" or "The Pursuer", depending on the region. This game is one of my favorites as it adds to the story of the downfall of Raccoon City and the Umbrella Corporation. The game is darker, grittier and contains the same amount of survival horror as the first 2. The only downside to this game is it is shorter than the first 2. The game takes place more so in the city and not so much in an indoor environment as Resident Evils 1 and 2 so you get to see what has happened to the city since the T-Virus outbreak. It adds more depth to the game and more despair as the citizens have fell victim to the virus.

I have to say that this show is amazing. If you love D&D, I highly (x10) recommend this show. It is very entertaining and the talent of these voice actors really bring the characters to life. The DM (Matt Mercer) is the one of, if not, the best DM I have every seen. He brings the NPC character to life and it not afraid to mix it up a little. He has written his own campaigns and he tells the story in great detail and makes it so much fun to watch. The main cast brings in some of the best role playing I have every seen and mixes it with comedy and seriousness (but not too serious to the point where its not enjoyable). I will continue to watch this with the uttermost enjoyment.