Steve Orr

While the acting is not great, it is a good movie if you like to think. If you can't give it your undivided attention, don't watch it. If you can, it is worth it as the story unfolds and becomes clear. I know what happened but am still pretty sure there are nuances I missed.

The first 95% rated 3 to 4 stars, but the ending was horrible.

Wow. The worst movie EVER, in my opinion, just got replaced by a landslide.

I watched the first movie and liked it because, although a little slow, you didn't know what was going on. It kept you invested and was plausible. The sequel was the worst I have ever seen. The hero, who is impulsive, set a record for leading his team into stupid situations. One good guy died early, but the rest escaped more certain-death situations than D. Johnson and family in San Andreas. It was THAT bad! I absolutely refuse to watch the third. I could care less how it turns out. I do know from the ending of the second one that the hero will be making more stupid choices (and surviving them.)

This movie was horrible. It turned a dark, tortured character with plenty of weaknesses into a female Rambo. I can't think of one favorable thing to say about it. The fact that it was not written by Stieg was evident in the inconsistencies with the previous movies that continued to pop up. Or blame the screenwriters.