Second half is the real saver for the movie. First half every woman drinks, nothing good shown about gays, flimsy reason given for sperm donorship. Some bit of foot ball coming after getting inspired by the director’s son. Lady is shown as competing with her own lover boy for the contract proposal win. What is that the movie teaching is unknown? Nothing inspiring. In the name of advanced thought the lady was shown as taking decision that men are needed only for bearing child and given the option of bearing child without men she will opt for that. In the end the lady quips in a disgusting tone that she doesn't believe in marriage, this without justifying why marriage is not a great tool for reinforcing commitment. Looks like the director is thoroughly confused about liberty, equality and fraternity. Give it a miss please…