What is the point of asking a prominent individual such as the Prime Minister onto the show, asking him questions and then refusing to listen, and to talk over the responses. The tone of this interview was far more inflammatory than the language used within the recent rather pointless debates in the Commons, that Mr Marr complained of, especially when compared to the easy ride that was given to Angela Rayner who just happened to be a Labour politician - so no hint of bias there then. I, and as far as I can see, many others, consider Mr Marr's badgering and goading of the Prime Minister to be totally unacceptable. Nobody listening to this interview learnt anything of consequence, because detailed responses were not allowed to be made and heard, other than the clear fact that Mr Marr is clearly biased, partisan, reflecting the views of his employer only, and that he likes the sound of his own views.