Shockingly racist. In spite of Bolivar giving enormous, if not main, credit to Haiti and its first president, Alexandre Pétion, for his success --
[“Should I not let it be known to later generations that Alexander Petion is the true liberator of my country?" and in a letter to Petion: “ . . . I must declare that you are the author of our liberty.”], Petion is not mentioned anywhere in the series, nor is Haiti revealed to have been called by Bolivar “the only free republic in the new world", on whose constitution he modeled the Venezeluan one. Bolivar's arrival in Haiti is pivotal, for it was Petion who made it possible for Bolivar to get out of poverty in the Carribean with full support that included ships, a printing press, hundreds of Haitain soldiers and sailors, military strategists and ammunition. Bolivar was in Haiti to garner support, not only once, but twice. Instead, the series shamelessly leads us to believe that the meager support of an Englishman he meets in Jamaica and a 'Haitian trader' helped Bolivar get back to Venezuela.
Trying to make up for this racist erasure of Haiti's important influence in Bolivar's military and political successes by incidental references to the racial issue and the depiction of intimate relationships between Bolivar and his black slaves is dishonest and 'white' self-serving. Haiti as the haven of American and European revolutionaries of the 19th century was a more relevant and stimulating place for Bolivar's development than Paris.
But kudos for a production that makes us think about history and how the colonization of historical narratives continues.