The moto of the story is male with female ego war ,and it doesn't necessary that female always wins or whatever constitutional priveleges they have doesn't mean that they can claim or expect anything unfair or engage in someone's personal matter,all have funadamental rights is ok men ,women but its doesn't mean that a college student just for the sake of publicty try to provoke or revolt against the college adminsitration based on personal or family matters just like right now top colleges are doing in India ,JNU ,jadavpur etc against NRC ,colege is for studies not for politics or union hence our country can never grow so much ,anyway, matter teacher ADITI roychowdhury is a teacher as well as sankho ,they must have different principles as aditi called sankho asa mother not asa teacher hence sankho insults aditi asa mother which she can not a a public teacher which tehy can get as a voice record still this protest against him aand college meaningless ,he is an adult and as a son he can insult his mother but not asa etacher ,which he did so its nothing wrong still scriptwriter uses these types of scripts asa baseless ,boys/men are not so trivial that just becasue for the sake of female viewers to attact them asa business you can't show up men or male character as a suelss fellow without any good dialogues ,try to add strong powerful dialogues compare to heroine ,then it will be more interesting as men are not toys in front of women that they can do whatever they want ,so as a reality story not just a fictional or imaginative story out of this world.