Kanaka Teja

It seems that first half was directed by Anil Ravipudi while the latter half was done by Brother Anil (to be read as "NAIVE" and nothing to demean him). Editor should have chopped most of the scrap in 2nd half. I felt that 90's cartoons were far better when compared to some visuals in the background. Priyadarshi remains under utilised. Overall a better film for the family audience compared to others in this festive season. +ves : 1st half was fantastic. Special mention to Vintage Victory Venkatesh and Tamanna

Amid huge hype and expectations the movie Agnyaathavaasi released today. I feel sad to say that it's a way beneath a good movie. Story : I half : Its just the introduction of all the leading characters. I bet you don't feel anything significantly missed even if you arrive one hour late to the theatre. II half : Boman Irani being tired of unhealthy human relations raises his kid (Pawan) far away from his wealth and fame. After the sudden demise of Boman Irani his company shackles to the root. The rest is all about Pawan chasing the mysterious murderer of his father and rescuing the throttling empire of Boman Irani. Pros : 1.Entrances of both Pawan kalyan and Aadhi are superb. 2. Picturisation of the first song is very good. 3. Rao Ramesh, Aadhi, Thanikella Bharani nailed their characters. Cons : 1. Heroines didn't have any significant part. 2. Boring, dull and sheer stupid first half. 3. Circumlocution in second half. 4. Dialogues are of novice in nature rather raconteur Summing it all I didn't have a great experience watching it. It's hard to digest that this is a bad movie for PSPK fans ( including me) but we should accept it. If you have extra free time you may read the following : Guess many of you have watched the movies One nenokkadine and Nannaku prematho. The former though not quite successful at box office was applauded by audience. The latter failed to please any of them.The reason is simple One involved logic but Nannaku prematho was made of logics. The same case apply to Trivikram as well. Referring mythology in a modern movie is indeed a tough task yet Trivikram pulled it out successfully many a time. In contrast to sprinkling those scenes here and there most of the second half of Agnyaathavaasi was made out of those scenes. Almost every dialogue uttered from Pawan's mouth is either referring to mythology or philosophical in nature. I agree that's the strength of Trivikram. When a director show cases his strength it makes a great impact on screen. But when a director shows off his hold on a particular subject in every single scene it looks terrible. I guess this time it backfired for Trivikram. Views expressed above are solely on basis of personal opinion and many of yours might be against mine. Thank you!

First things first the movie is an average film. First half : Nani misunderstands his sister in law thinking that she was the cause for the declining rapport between him and his brother. By the time he realises her care and affection towards him she lands into a trouble with antagonist. Second half : Its all about saving his sister in law from the attacks of the villain. You can fill the void with love story parallel to the plot in both first and second halves which completes the movie. The flick is an ideal to the families who would love to watch plain movies. Pros : Natural star Nani's action. Routine but a decent first half. Sai Pallavi's dance and energy. Cons : I have to say songs are pretty boring. Slow and disengaging second half. Apparently priyadarshi, Krishna Teja and other comedians aren't efficiently used. So entertainment is a bit on the lower note.