D G

Full of gay clichés and tropes. No pathos whatsoever. There was nothing driving this film forward or deeper. The only authentic emotion one should feel towards the storyline and characters is that of complete indifference. However I've no doubt that it will receive 5 stars since the subject matter reflects the current zeitgeist. Either that or viewers will give it 5 stars because they're too scared to go against the gay agenda.

A long, laborious, disjointed and tortuous storyline. I didn't feel sufficiently entertained to invest time watching this. What's the point in having a great cast when the plot is too difficult to follow? It wasn't clear enough, entertaining enough or gritty enough to grab ones attention.

Some great characterisation and acting. However much of the storylines were unnecessarily tenuous and laborious at times - although season 2 structure was far superior to seasons 1 and 3. It was the quality of acting that kept me watching more than the plot per se. They could easily have reduced the number of episodes in each season without losing losing much of the story and quality. If anything, that would've improved the show. The sign of a really good show is how you answer the question: Would you watch it again in the future?. I'd say yes to the likes of Ozark, Peaky Blinders and Boardwalk Empire....but definitely no "Sneaky Pete."

It's akin to a low budget TV movie. Full of cliches and ham acting. Weak and contrived to a ridiculous degree. Fortunately it's so bad that it's instantly forgettable. That's it's only saving grace. Proof that good actors can make awful movies sometimes. No doubt it will get a few more stars by virtue of the eye candy - both male and female.

There's nothing like a good bit of gritty realism...... and this was nothing like a good bit of gritty realism! I find it impossible to invest myself to this silliness and ham acting. The overacting by the cartel boss was laughable. Evidently good actors are capable of bad acting.

This is further evidence to the fact that women are rarely funny and simply cannot do nuanced comedy - although Motherland is a wonderful exception.. It tries way too hard to edgy, but it simply doesn't work .

A self-aggrandizing indulgent documentary made by Serena, about Serena from begining to end. Feel free to tune in to any episode you choose. They are all basically the same! The theme was the same and the language was the same. It takes some skill to make an authentic legend so incredibly boring. I was bored by the end of the first episode, so just imagine how I felt after watching hours of stuff. The majority of her story could've been covered in one episode. Sometimes it's better not to know too much about our heros. And I speak as a fan of both tennis and Serena.

Some solid performances but the plot got a bit mumbled and lost its way at times making it unnecessarily difficult for the viewer to follow. It tells the story of a conwoman but doesn't tell the story particularly well.

Why does he have a manic glazed look painted in his eyes throughout the entire movie? I love Cooper. I love Bernstein, but for some reason I find Cooper playing Bernstein somewhat irritating! Dare I call it overacting and self indulgent! And don't get me started on the inane flowery dialogue. But by all means give it a 5 star review because Hollywood tells you it is. Thankfully Bernstein was infinitely more engaging in real life than this movie.