Aidan Phifer

Just wanted to offset the insane review bombing of this somewhat mediocre but not terrible film. This review will have some spoilers but I try to keep much of it vague. A lot of these reviews appear to be mass written by AI, often repeating the exact same points word for word, making completely false statements about the film, and completely missing the ideas and themes that have been present in this series since 28 days later. For example, many of these reviews keep crying about the parallels in the film made with wars of the past that are compared in cut aways between people fighting infected today and people fighting other people as far back as medieval times. There is an important quote made by the character Major Henry West in the first film, 28 days later, "People killing people, which is much what I saw in the four weeks before infection, and the four weeks before that, and before that, and as far back as I care to remember. People killing people, which to my mind, puts us in a state of normality right now." It illustrates that the uninfected and infected are currently at war, and though it seems new it is really not so different from many wars of the past. This could even provoke one to consider if some zombie films are really so much different from many war films. This is just one example of what I think the film gets very right about the 28 series. The film generally captures the horror of the films that came before. I was felt a great amount of suspense and anxiousness throughout the film, it built tension well. I found the new elements interesting with the infected and rage virus interesting as well as the general themes presented through the character "Dr Kelson". It's not as good as the first film but I think it's as good or better than the second. Kind of like the second film the leading character(s) is a child. However, unlike the second film, its a proper coming of age story about a boy growing up in an abandoned, desolate, broken world. It's a journey of him finding meaning and purpose, with his most important lesson being learning to let go. Over all I would recommend it as a decent film.

Masterpiece finale, just saw it on amazon prime.

The game was a great and rewarding adventure, even someone like me who only started getting truly familiar with and interested in the Star Wars franchise 7 months ago. I did have trouble getting a hang of trying to balance the difficulties as I wanted to find a mode that felt challenging and immersive but also enjoyable at the same time. Ultimately I chose Jedi Master. The game doesn't feel like a hack and slash bum rush. The main character Cal Kestis isn't all powerful, he is lacks in experience and can barely hold his own against the more powerful foes. As he learns and grows both as a person and in his abilities, you are learning with him, which makes for a beautiful adventure. I highly recommend this game to those considering playing themselves a new definitive Star Wars video game title.

I guess it's just the ultimate classic. I can't see this ever being bumped out of my top 10. Though as a mecha show people come for the action, this franchise is far bigger than that. I wouldn't even call the action a major focus, however good it may be. If you are simply a casual viewer, this show probably isn't for you. Evangelion is very psychological when it comes to it's characters. The characters are written in a very relatable , very human fashion. They are beautifully exposed for all the traits, both admirable and flawed. This show also isn't meant to have it's themes and elements baby fed to you(referring back to my point about casual viewers), this is art meant to be analyzed, typical of most psychological shows. Nothing in this show should be taken only at face value. If you aren't feeling up to that, you should probably watch something else.

I honestly don't understand why the other reviewers are complaining about the actors being underage. From a view of the when this movie was released child pornography wasn't as infamous and criminalized. Furthermore, it would be unrealistic for them to not start banging until they were 18, simple human biology isn't going to bend over for the sake of social norms and the age of consent. Its a good film, don't ruin it for yourself by trying to compare it towards today's standards.

I suppose the only part I saw as real disappointment is that it doesn't go over the fact that Kevin Carter was not in a position to really help the struggling child from his Pulitzer winning photograph. He was under very strict instruction not to help individuals like that child in order to prevent the spread of disease.