Arafat Habib

Just what the hell is wrong with Rotten Tomatoes? You guys didn't like the political message or what? I found it to be the best TV show in the past 10 years. Awesome narrative, theme, plot, twists, acting, suspence. Simply brilliant - best of the very best. Many would find it hard to binge watch this series.

[Non-spoiler] This will get your heart pumping from minute 1. The rushness dies down in the middle part in bond-style dialogue heavy glossy-stylish-dinner-yatch setup. The third act picks up the beats again. You might have heard it before - this is a plot heavy film. However, the lack of emotional engagement is too audicious and one of the the biggest flaws of this film. The plot is great. Acting was good (Pattinson has come a long way since Twilight). The exposition and excessive reliance on dialogue were poor. It's action sequences were possibly the worst I have seen in a Nolan film - those felt raw and lacking in novelty/brilliance. A particular scene (road heist - lasting about 10 minutes) felt really stupid. The finale action felt like unnecessary nuisance. The rawness of the action indicates that the making of this film was probably affected by Covid-19 (both in re-shoot and editing). However, these are not the worst features of this film. It's the plot-length ratio. At most part the film felt rushed, cramped, despite it being two and half hours long. This plot and story needed 4 hours at least to express them adequately. If it were not a Nolan film, critics might have rated it below 50. 82% in Rotten Tomatoes seems too generous.

Complete waste of time. Very poor story. Acting and cenematography were good, but that's about it. Everything else is below average. The trailer gave away everything. If you have watched Weakerman, you would know what to expect. Don't know what the so called critics found in it. Maybe they are having hangover from Hereditary.

Great movie 10/10. The best action film of the year (yes, it's better than MI6) and possibly the best in past 10 years. It has a certain uniqueness like the Bourne Identity and Transporter 1. All the action scenes were novel and you can see the effort that have been put into this film. Acting, plot, theme, everything was perfect. The only reason for the critics' negative reviews could be that this movie is a significant tonal shift from the 2011 version. But that's just an excuse, isn't it? Critics nowadays do not like anything that doesn't come out of the Disney Corp. Go and watch this film, you will not regret.

Loved the movies. Critics have been absolutely bonkers. Is Disney paying them for these?