Michael Columbo

"Superhero" movies, why do they keep trying to beat a dead horse? The premise is beyond childish. Unless the formula is fixed, they will continue to put trash up on the screen. A total waste of time.

This seemed like it had potential to be decent, but it was a flop. Combine poor direction with a miserable script, and you get an amalgam of unwatchable trash. The pace was terrible, and the director essentially made you feel like you were abducted by boring you to death with useless scenes that do not help any understanding of what the film is trying (and failing) to tell us. Do not pay a dime to see this dumpster fire of a movie. It is not worth seeing for free either.

If you look at the ratings, you will see a bunch of five stars from people who do not know what a movie is supposed to be, and a larger number of 1-star ratings, which truly reflect Jurassic World Rebirth. To sum up the flaws of the story (with no spoilers) is easy: Crappy storyline. Check Horrible writing. Check Zero plot. Check Bad acting. Check Ridiculous special effects and stunts. Check Horrible directing. Check All of the above combine to make a crummy film. Watch anything else.

I disliked the first two "28" franchise movies, but was compelled to watch this piece of excrement. This was a mistake, and I wish I could have spent my two hours sleeping instead. The film did have an initial flavor of redemption for the other terrible movies with a father-son character development plot. This quickly turned sour and became something that had no purpose other than filling screen time. Even if you saw the first two "28" movies and somehow liked them, skip this one like the rage virus.

Sex, drugs, and rock 'n roll. People seem to be mesmerized by it, even though it gives them nothing in return. Easy Rider attempts to be a movie about freedom, but all it illustrates is that stoners are worthless fools who think they are free, when in fact they are simply addicted to a fallacy. The characters roamed around doing nothing, all while accomplishing nothing. There was no point to the whole film except for doing drugs. That is not avant-garde filmmaking; that is just sophomoric laziness. I am sure Dennis Hopper thought he was clever when he made it, but the film was about nothing. The only good part was when the anti-heroes died and we were freed of their useless story.

I was surprised that I would like this film so much. It was a thought-provoking documentary based on the book Grey Wolf. The documentary did not dwell on the fact that there was never any proof that Hitler died in the infamous bunker, but focused on what life would have been like for the Nazi party refugees that could have escaped to South America. The mechanisms and money were there, so why could there not have been successful escapes to freedom in a new world away from prying eyes? A very well put-together production. Well worth your 60 minutes of watch time.

I have to agree with the majority of the reviews here. It is one of the worst movies in any genre. It is right up there with "Plan 9 from Outer Space." Horrible writing and intentionally bad acting combine with ridiculous directing to make utter crap. It was as though the film was intentionally bad, but with no punchline ever coming. Watch anything else other than this POS.

I can understand why many people liked this film. It does attempt to emulate the change factor from human to animal as in the Jack Nicholson film Wolf, but it is not nearly as good. Wolf Man would be worth watching if you can stream it for free and watch it with some popcorn at home as part of a scary movies night. Otherwise, just skip it, the special effects are not that good, the writing is bland, and the acting is just subpar. If you like dark night scenes where you cannot see much, then try to watch it. For me, when a writer and director depend on black night scenes to convey all the horror, they lose me. If you cannot see the actors and the acting clearly, then why bother?

It is a musical. Musicals are either incredible or terrible. This one was terrible. Some people enjoy the ridiculous over-the-top melodrama-like world that is created by a musical. I do not, unless it is extremely well executed and tempered with exceptional storytelling. This is not such a film as it has too many musical numbers that go nowhere and are needless.

If you have never seen "Dances with Wolves," go watch it first, it is not great, but it is a better story. Overall, the movie is equivalent to watching paint dry. The fact that Kevin Costner did not decide to finish the story he started in Yellowstone to do this thing tells you that it is all about his ego. The storyline of Horizon is just one ridiculous cliche after another, for three hours. This is why, Part 2 has not been in theatres yet, there is no interest in ultra-long trash movie productions. Costner has a love for Western-style movies, probably because Dances made him a household name. However, his insistence on this story being made clearly shows that he just likes playing a cowboy, but has no interest in telling a good story about one. Some nice cinematography in many of the day shots. The writing was poor and the acting was not any better. A waste of every dollar spent on production. A total disgrace to the Western genre.