Skahg (Skahg)

3/4 of it isn't bad. Mostly a sob story about the effects of public shaming, until of course they start talking about section 230. The whole documentary goes off the rails because of it. They could have made a really profound statement if they actually tried to address the problems they outlined. Instead of trying to scare social media companies into censoring the sites, they operate. We should be going after employers that fire people without due process, in reaction to Twitter mobs. Not opening up social media to liability. That's a bad recipe that would lead to the next Ad-pocolypse.