There is too much exposition in this film, not enough character development & too little actual conflict between the protagonists to maintain the story weโre being told & the performances the players enact.
The reality of the story was that the female character decided her husband was not enough for her and not what she wanted, yet she failed to take responsibility for her contribution to the circumstances of the marriage.
On the contrary, she wants to punish him for his inadequacies in her eyes without forewarning him of the true extent of her feelings along the way, which is in her.
What is on him is his infidelity, which is cause enough alone for her to leave. Itโs only later we find out she discovered his infidelity by hacking his email which is no less an act of betrayal.
Couldnโt she have acted like an adult as asked him?
In the life she finally achieves, she has taken responsibility and her new partner has taken up the โplaying with the kidโ role in her household, having asserted her own independent capabilities, but only by having sabotaged his.
He provided her the love and protection she sought. She was unable to assert her own independence within the marriage blaming him for leading. The fact he agreed to let the son go with her to LA to pursue an acting job shows he was able to compromise once she decided to take responsibility for herself.
For his part, he was unable to distinguish between his dislike of her and the things she did that he could not abide, and the disfunctional reasons he had difficulties in relationships. This was touched on but never explored.
The failures here are in the screenplay, the direction (telling not showing), the acting (mainly the child who didnโt have any chemistry with the parents & the caricatured lawyers) and the score was very lacking in conveying the tone of emotions (what the hell was that karaoke scene?).