Germán Rivas

I am totally appalled for the utter subjective opinion that describes this book at first glance in the layout of this query; clear feminist bias that serve a political purpose. The book is about the chaotic nature of human relationships and the counterpart that women's nature offer to any rapport with a man and society in general... nonetheless Schopenhauer was a "pessimist", aware of chaos as a lurking menace for society: energy and entropy. Any how, the over all perception about the book is that women an men have their own way of expressing their cognitive dissonance and internal chaos, him talking from his perspectives - and given the zeitgeist - can only define the identity of women from the perspective of men as providers and structural element of society, being clearly stated that women rule over the family unit: or that it's the ideal dynamics in the society of that time; so there is counter balance, yin and yang.