Rob Tierney

The show is kind of goofy dumb fun. I mean that scene where the CGI buffalo tacklles that girl over her picknet basket... Epic..

Great action film. A good comedy survival horror mashup with the added bonus of the crazy politics backstory. Kind of makes fun of everyone in an easily dismissive way. Well done. And not easily predictable, always a plus. Anyone overthinking this film, needs to realize, it's just a film.

In fairness, I say it gets more like a 2.75 out of 5. I wonder if nostalgia is helping this film a lot. But it is lighthearted, able to brings some laughs. Armchair quarterbacks will have rightful reason to nit pick certain decisions... I for one, am a little surprised they din't write the young ladies to be 21st century versions of their dad's bromance, rather than an obvious cloning of them in female form. I mean, it would of seemed far more authentic to see their fathers in them, then to be their fathers. And run with that for comedic effect. But actors work with the script they are given. Aside from that, it was a fun popcorn movie...

A good period piece film. Great cast, good acting. Story is a bit predictable but easy to watch. Costuming and art direction well done... Does a good job of explaining the economic craziness of the time, but that story feels a bit tug of war with focus on the characters. Overall, a good film to watch.

You can see the end comming in this one, sort of a telegraphed punch. I don't really get the hype about the film. While it's an interesting story, with characters you usually understand.. We've seen this story already in countless films. So the originality mostly a mesh up of other ideas, executed well. No doubt, there are political, social, and cultural concepts being preached about in this film. And on some of that, it's totally understandable to see the punch land. Good acting, somewhat open ended characters that don't always make sense... A good popcorn film out of S. Korea.

While the plot is a bit predictable. It should be noted that all the young actors did a great job.

Most interesting thing about Star Wars Disney, will be a the documentary's to come about what the heck happened to cause a major movie studio to drop the ball so hard. Rise of Skywalker is Disney's last attempt to patch the lack of any plot continuation from film seven to nine. It's so bad, they didn't have a bad guy worthy of our attention, and they pull a "Palpatine out of a bag." And because there wasn't a meeting (apparently) at Disney when they decided to do Star Wars. There's nobody (apparently) in charge of the entire three film trilogy to provide a sensible story. Problem isn't an exciting story, problem is, THEY NEVER EVEN TRIED.

The movie was fun. It was science fiction. Sci-Fi is something that requires people to just let go of reality, and enjoy being entertained. The lead actors were fun to watch. Hera Hilmarsdóttir, and Robert Sheehan, are probably two of better young talents that go way under the radar in films today. Hugo Weaving always plays a good villain. For those saying the story could of been more. It never helps when something get's formatted to fit a few hours for one movie, versus writing something that might span out more. That feels like what happened here. I think it did a good job of condensed story telling. Good popcorn movie. Ya don't have to go looking for the meaning of life in it.

I have to give respect to whoever landed the casting of the two lead actors. Both actors admitted in interviews that they were drawn to the film because of the lengthy interview "dialogue" scenes. They said the scenes were like being in a play. While the story seems to represent (well) many religious viewpoints and religious constructs, it doesn't seem to have invested much research into the atheist, agnostic, or those logical constructs against religious claims, faith, or general belief in the existence of God. (Specifically, speaking of the Abraham Religions in the film.) The story seems to be written from a religious thinkers viewpoint, and skips over many valid arguments contesting those ideas. The skipping seemed very intentional, or at least lacked "reading up" onto opposing views. Anyone looking for a fair academic debate represented in the film, will likely be disappointed. It's one sided, and the cards stacked. That being said, the film can be interesting at times, but very choppy. While it has a good heart at the center, the story itself, drags on outside the interview scenes. And many of the character interactions, seem very immature, elementary, and even eye rolling at times. The conflict between husband and wife, and the motivations that led to their problems, was rather insulting of one particular sex. I'd give this film a 1.5 out of 5 stars... Good Acting, by two good actors.

I haven't seen this movie. Is it Pitch Perfect 17?