“All’s Fair” — Or Is It?
I was genuinely excited for Ryan Murphy’s All’s Fair — I mean, with a powerhouse trio like Glenn Close, Naomi Watts, and Sarah Paulson, how could I not be? So, naturally, when it dropped today, I dove straight into the first three episodes… only to surface rather disappointed.
Let’s start with the positives: Sarah Paulson. She carries this show on her back with the kind of grace and intensity that reminds you what acting should look like. She’s the heartbeat in an otherwise faltering body of work.
Now for the not-so-fair part — Kim Kardashian. I wanted to root for her; I really did. It’s great that she’s crossed over into acting, but sadly, she’s brought the rest of the cast down to her level. Every line, every laugh, every flick of the hair — it’s pure Keeping Up With the Kardashians. There’s no transformation, no depth, no moment where you forget you’re watching Kim K play… Kim K.
The script doesn’t help either. It’s surprisingly flat — more “GCSE creative writing assignment” than the sharp, layered storytelling we’ve come to expect from Ryan Murphy. It’s all a bit immature, especially from the man who gave us American Horror Story and Feud.
Still, I’ll keep watching — partly out of loyalty to Murphy’s past brilliance, partly in the faint hope it might find its footing. Time will tell whether All’s Fair will redeem itself or remain a cautionary tale of style over substance.
My Rating: 2.5/5 — All’s fairly disappointing.