This is a very timely and convincing book, which inflicts devastating blows onto Social Justice fundamentalism and it’s activism (through postcolonial theory, queer theory, critical race theory, intersectionality, feminism, gender studies, disability and fat studies). Universities should be undertaking scholarship, not activism for ideologies (which is referred to as “Theory”). Why are these areas being subsidised by government funding, if they don’t adhere to academic standards?
“by the late 1990s, postmodernism in its purest, original form had fallen out of fashion, but Theory had not. It provided radical activists, including scholar-activists, with an all-encompassing way of thinking about the world and society, which still informs much scholarship in the humanities and has made considerable inroads into the social sciences, especially sociology, anthropology, and psychology… the conception of society based on the postmodern knowledge and political principles – that set of radically skeptical ideas, in which knowledge, power, and language are merely oppressive social constructs to be exploited by the powerful – has not only survived more or less intact but also flourished within many identity- and culture-based “studies” fields, especially in the so-called “Theoretical humanities.” These, in turn, influence and often hold sway over the social sciences and professional programs like education, law, psychology, and social work, and have been carried by activists and media into broader culture.”
While arguing for liberalism quite forcefully, the book does prompt asking whether progress has been made since the 1980s and 1990s…
“It is therefore no exaggeration to observe that Social Justice Theorists have created a new religion, a tradition of faith that is actively hostile to reason, falsification, disconfirmation, and disagreement of any kind.”
“What is, perhaps, most frustrating about Theory is that it tends to get literally every issue it’s primarily concerned with backwards, largely due to its rejection of human nature, science, and liberalism. It allots social significance to racial categories, which inflames racism. It attempts to depict categories of sex, gender, and sexuality as mere social constructions, which undermines the fact that people often accept sexual minorities because they recognize that sexual expression varies naturally... Theory is highly likely to spontaneously combust at some point, but it could cause a lot of human suffering and societal damage before it does.”
In addition to concluding that Social Justice activism is a form of religious belief, there are some nuanced recommendations for better paths forwards (for universities, for policy, and for society). This book is an enlightening read, and is worth ploughing through the 270 pages of quite dense text.