While 96 is celebrated for its nostalgia, music, and raw emotions, it is hard to ignore the ethical dilemmas it portrays. The movie glorifies emotional cheating, which, in many ways, is worse than physical infidelity. The central characters, Ram and Jaanu, clearly still have unresolved feelings for each other, yet the film tries to justify their emotional entanglement as innocent or even romantic. This raises significant moral questions, especially in the context of Janani being married.
The film subtly endorses the idea that it is acceptable to maintain intimate emotional ties with an ex, even after marriage, under the guise of “pure love.” Any decent man would understand boundaries, and Ram’s actions—like touching Jaanu without her explicit consent—are framed as tender and respectful, yet they blur ethical lines. The fact that Jaanu is comfortable staying at Ram's place overnight sends a problematic message about boundaries in relationships.
The movie's narrative romanticizes this dynamic instead of critically addressing the consequences of such actions.
Ultimately, 96 struggles to balance its emotional weight with moral accountability. While its storytelling and performances are commendable, the film inadvertently normalizes emotional cheating and questionable boundaries, making it a deeply problematic narrative beneath its sentimental exterior.