Dasein

THIS MOVIE?, COME ON WHY ARE THE SPECIAL EFFECTS WORST THAN TITANIC 2 IN 2010, titanic cgi by James Cameron is better but NO ONE IS THINKING THAT THIS MOVIE IS NEWEER THAN TITANIC, also the special effects are PS2 LIKE, THIS LOW BUDGET MOVIE, also by James Cameron titanic cgi are very realistic but this movie britannic CGIS ARE POOR, Also this movie is inaccurate and very bad but WITH PURPLE TINT EFFECT THAT CAME FROM 1970S TO 1990S THIS MOVIE EVEN OCCURS TINT PURPLE EFFECT, THIS IS INACCURATE BECAUSE THE SHIP SINKS IN THE MORNING BUT NOT SUNRISE BECAUSE BRITANNIC SINKS AT 9:00 AM THIS MOVIE THE DAYLIGHT WAS SUNRISE, THIS IS SO EARLY, AND THE BRITANNIC DID NOT CAPSIZED CORRECTLY AND THE FUNNEL COLLAPSE SOUND, GOSH WHY ARE THE FUNNEL COLLAPSE SOUNDED LIKE 1980S WITH LOW QUALITY WATER SPLASH SOUND ON FUNNEL COLLAPSE SOUND EFFECT.

I'm not sure but this cgi in james cameron 1997 is better but this titanic 2 movie cgi was worse but britannic is more worst, also I prefer the 1997 except this Shane Van Dyke, james cameron is better, also why are the water splash not accurate in this movie

Very sad but more Oscar and likely realistic and better cgi and the movie looked like 2020s but it's 1990s Even though titanic is better than britannic television, britannic television cgi ps2 look so bad, Also rose and jack are romance and titanic movie is fancy and modern look And high budget movie also 2 MILLION DOLLARS BEHIND THE SCENE THAT IS INSANE while another movie Poseidon 2006 rating is 10/10 Also titanic rating 10.1/10 even this cool 90s movies REALISTIC With wide-screen ALSO JACK'S DEATH WAS SO SAD AlsO THE BEST MOVIE