Hardly a fitting conclusion to the TV franchise, and quite obviously mounted with either a sequel or reboot of the show in mind, Downton Abbey - the movie, pursues two winning narratives - the primary, focused on the arrival of the King and Queen for a night's respite on their royal tour, the other, embroiling the dashing Tom Branson, first in an assassination plot, and later, in an unlikely romance with the winsome 'servant' girl who will one day inherit the estate. How Cinderella can you get? The movie works, both as a stand-alone piece, as well as to further the tale of the Crawley clan.
Discarded in the shuffle, time-honored favs, Lady Rosamund, Mr. Mason, cousin Rose and her husband. Since season 3 of the TV series, when writer/director/producer, Julian Fellowes killed off two of his most beloved characters - youngest daughter, Sybil, and then, Matthew Crawley - moments following the birth of his son, Downton struggled from a dearth of baddies to hold our interest - especially after the departure of evil lady's maid, O'Brien. The movie inveigles a few of the remaining stalwarts in a series of machinations slavishly devoted to the royal visit, but without any staying power.
There is no point to Tony Sellick's sudden appearance as the hunky plumber who arrives twice to fix an ailing boiler, only to stir kitchen maid, Daisy's heart, much to her boyfriend, Andy's chagrin. And Sellick never does return after tickling her fancy once or twice. So, what was the point. Also, too much time spent on Thomas' exploration of London's alternative lifestyle clubs, comes to not - if only - the fleeting promise of a bromance with the King's gay valet.
The main characters we've come to know and love are mostly underutilized. Hugh Bonneville and Elizabeth McGovern, as the Earl and Countess of Grantham are basically reduced to token figures in their own house. Ditto for Brendan Coyle and Joan Froggatt's ever devoted Anna and Bates. And what exactly was the point to delaying the arrival of Henry Talbot's arrival to the manor house until barely 8 min. before the final fade out? Why bring him back at all. He had nothing to do with the story.
I did appreciate the Tom Branson storyline, which takes precedent and outweighs the superficial Royal stay-over story line. But we really don't become engaged to any of our other favs from the TV show - Fellowes giving us too much of the side order without ever serving up the main course.
It's all lavishly produced, with magnificent production values to boot. Some of the cinematography was too dark. I mean, the Downton cellar looked like something out of Madam Defarge's Bastille in A Tale of Two Cities. Overall, A+ for effort. B- for results.