I'd like to praise this film (because everyone must have sympathy for suffering Palestinians), but can't. Two problems:
First: Jewish people were going to Palestine in large numbers in the 1930s because they saw what was coming in Europe. Hitler became Chancellor in 1933, the Nuremberg Laws were announced in 1935. We all know what happened to those who stayed. What did Palestinians think Jews should do? They might have said, That's not our problem. But surely, you can't ignore suffering? Palestinians today need their suffering to be noticed. So did the Jews in the 1930s. And then I notice that there's not a single Jewish speaking part in the whole film. The difficult question - What's the alternative? - isn't even raised.
Second: if I were a young Palestinian watching the film, I'd see it as a call to arms to continue the struggle. Women tell a boy not to shine a soldier's boots, but to shoot him; a father bites his son's hand to teach him to persevere through pain; a boy walks up to an off-duty soldier and shoots him. There is no sense of the futility of conflict. There is no nuance about who is good, who is bad. Palestinians who work with the occupiers are naรฏve, greedy, or on the Zionists' payroll. Good Palestinians are Palestinians who fight.
Yes, it's good to see a film from the Palestinian perspective, made by Palestinians for Palestinians; yes, Palestinians have the right to make their own propaganda to counter the propaganda that's come from the West over the last 90 years (Palestine 36 may be to the Palestinian cause what Exodus was to the Zionist cause in 1960). But this is a route to continuing conflict. I cannot see how this film contributes in any way to a peaceful outcome to the ongoing suffering.
I hope I am wrong.